Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 260

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Induction of programmed cell death in Arabidopsis and rice by single‐wall carbon nanotubes

Shen, Cong‐Xiang, Zhang, Quan‐Fang, Li, Jian, Bi, Fang‐Cheng, Yao, Nan·2010·American Journal of Botany

Abstract

• Premise of the study: Single‐walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) have many unique structural and mechanical properties. Their potential applications, especially in biomedical engineering and medical chemistry, have been increasing in recent years, but the toxicological impact of nanoparticles has rarely been studied in plants. • Methods: We exposed Arabidopsis and rice leaf protoplasts to SWCNTs and examined cell viability, DNA damage, reactive oxygen species generation, and related gene expression. We also tested the effects of nanoparticles on Arabidopsis leaves after injecting a SWCNT solution. EM‐TUNEL (electron‐microscopic terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase‐mediated dUTP nick end‐labeling) and a cerium chloride staining method were used. • Key results: SWCNTs caused adverse cellular responses including cell aggregation, chromatin condensation along with a TUNEL‐positive reaction, plasma membrane deposition, and H 2 O 2 accumulation. The effect of SWCNTs on the survival of cells was dose dependent, with 25 μg/mL inducing 25% cell death in 6 h. In contrast, activated carbon, which is not a nano‐sized carbon particle, did not induce cell death even 24 h after treatments. The data indicated that the nano‐size of the particle is a critical factor for toxicity. Moreover, endocytosis‐like structures with cerium chloride deposits formed after SWCNT treatment, suggesting a possible pathway for nanoparticles to traverse the cell membrane. • Conclusions: Consequently, SWCNTs have an adverse effect on protoplasts and leaves through oxidative stress, leading to a certain amount of programmed cell death. Although nanomaterials have great advantages in many respects, the benefits and side effects still need to be assessed carefully.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3732/ajb.1000073

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 260

Metadata

Authors
Shen, C., Zhang, Q., Li, J., Bi, F., & Yao, N.
Venue
American Journal of Botany
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-10
Volume
97
Issue
10
Pages
1602-1609
ISSN
  • 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2197
OpenAlex
W2118174147
Cited by
260
References
1
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Induction of programmed cell death in Arabidopsis and rice by single‐wall carbon nanotubes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3732/ajb.1000073
The paper
Shen, C., Zhang, Q., Li, J., Bi, F., & Yao, N. (2010). Induction of programmed cell death in Arabidopsis and rice by single‐wall carbon nanotubes. American Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1000073

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.