The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Induction of programmed cell death in Arabidopsis and rice by single‐wall carbon nanotubes
Abstract
• Premise of the study: Single‐walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) have many unique structural and mechanical properties. Their potential applications, especially in biomedical engineering and medical chemistry, have been increasing in recent years, but the toxicological impact of nanoparticles has rarely been studied in plants. • Methods: We exposed Arabidopsis and rice leaf protoplasts to SWCNTs and examined cell viability, DNA damage, reactive oxygen species generation, and related gene expression. We also tested the effects of nanoparticles on Arabidopsis leaves after injecting a SWCNT solution. EM‐TUNEL (electron‐microscopic terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase‐mediated dUTP nick end‐labeling) and a cerium chloride staining method were used. • Key results: SWCNTs caused adverse cellular responses including cell aggregation, chromatin condensation along with a TUNEL‐positive reaction, plasma membrane deposition, and H 2 O 2 accumulation. The effect of SWCNTs on the survival of cells was dose dependent, with 25 μg/mL inducing 25% cell death in 6 h. In contrast, activated carbon, which is not a nano‐sized carbon particle, did not induce cell death even 24 h after treatments. The data indicated that the nano‐size of the particle is a critical factor for toxicity. Moreover, endocytosis‐like structures with cerium chloride deposits formed after SWCNT treatment, suggesting a possible pathway for nanoparticles to traverse the cell membrane. • Conclusions: Consequently, SWCNTs have an adverse effect on protoplasts and leaves through oxidative stress, leading to a certain amount of programmed cell death. Although nanomaterials have great advantages in many respects, the benefits and side effects still need to be assessed carefully.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pacurari, M., Yin, X. J., Zhao, J., Ding, M., Leonard, S. S., Schwegler-Berry, D., Ducatman, B. S., Sbarra, D., Hoover, M. D., Castranova, V., et al. (2008) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.10924 · Cited by 372
Cited by
Tripathi, D. K., Shweta, Singh, S., Singh, S., Pandey, R., Singh, V. P., Sharma, N. C., Prasad, S. M., Dubey, N. K., & Chauhan, D. K. (2017) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.07.030 · Cited by 935
Schwab, F., Zhai, G., Kern, M., Turner, A., Schnoor, J. L., & Wiesner, M. R. (2016) · Nanotoxicology · doi:10.3109/17435390.2015.1048326 · Cited by 872
Nanoparticle-Based Sustainable Agriculture and Food Science: Recent Advances and Future Outlook
Mittal, D., Kaur, G., Singh, P., Yadav, K., & Ali, S. A. (2020) · Frontiers in Nanotechnology · doi:10.3389/fnano.2020.579954 · Cited by 788
Toxicity, Uptake, and Translocation of Engineered Nanomaterials in Vascular plants
Miralles, P., Church, T. L., & Harris, A. T. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es202995d · Cited by 549
Effects of Engineered Nanomaterials on Plants Growth: An Overview
Aslani, F., Bagheri, S., Muhd Julkapli, N., Juraimi, A. S., Hashemi, F. S. G., & Baghdadi, A. (2014) · The Scientific World Journal · doi:10.1155/2014/641759 · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Authors
- Shen, C., Zhang, Q., Li, J., Bi, F., & Yao, N.
- Venue
- American Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1602-1609
- ISSN
- 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2197
- OpenAlex
- W2118174147
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Induction of programmed cell death in Arabidopsis and rice by single‐wall carbon nanotubes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3732/ajb.1000073
- The paper
- Shen, C., Zhang, Q., Li, J., Bi, F., & Yao, N. (2010). Induction of programmed cell death in Arabidopsis and rice by single‐wall carbon nanotubes. American Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1000073
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.