Cited by 152Light effects on plantsPlant Molecular Biology ResearchPlant Parasitism and Resistance

Shoot phototropism in higher plants: New light through old concepts

Christie, John M., Murphy, Angus S.·2013·American Journal of Botany

Abstract

Light is a key environmental factor that drives many aspects of plant growth and development. Phototropism, the reorientation of growth toward or away from light, represents one of these important adaptive processes. Modern studies of phototropism began with experiments conducted by Charles Darwin demonstrating that light perception at the shoot apex of grass coleoptiles induces differential elongation in the lower epidermal cells. This led to the discovery of the plant growth hormone auxin and the Cholodny–Went hypothesis attributing differential tropic bending to lateral auxin relocalization. In the past two decades, molecular‐genetic analyses in the model flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana has identified the principal photoreceptors for phototropism and their mechanism of activation. In addition, several protein families of auxin transporters have been identified. Despite extensive efforts, however, it still remains unclear as to how photoreceptor activation regulates lateral auxin transport to establish phototropic growth. This review aims to summarize major developments from over the last century and how these advances shape our current understanding of higher plant phototropism. Recent progress in phototropism research and the way in which this research is shedding new light on old concepts, including the Cholodny–Went hypothesis, is also highlighted.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3732/ajb.1200340

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • No phosphorylation sites associated with the first positive phototropism have been identified under low-fluence blue light.

    “However, no phosphorylation sites associated with the first positive phototropism have been identified under low-fluence blue light (Sakai and Haga, 2012; Christie and Murphy, 2013).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 115 · Cited by 152

Authors
Christie, J. M., & Murphy, A. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
  • Christie, John M.
  • Murphy, Angus S.
Venue
American Journal of Botany
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-01
Volume
100
Issue
1
Pages
35-46
ISSN
  • 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2197
OpenAlex
W2164227005
Cited by
152
References
115
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Botany (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/J016047/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Parasitism and Resistance
Keywords
auxin transport, photoreceptors, Arabidopsis thaliana, coleoptile, plant growth regulation
MeSH terms
Indoleacetic Acids, Light, Models, Biological, Plant Shoots, Phototropism, Photoreceptors, Plant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review