Shoot phototropism in higher plants: New light through old concepts
Abstract
Light is a key environmental factor that drives many aspects of plant growth and development. Phototropism, the reorientation of growth toward or away from light, represents one of these important adaptive processes. Modern studies of phototropism began with experiments conducted by Charles Darwin demonstrating that light perception at the shoot apex of grass coleoptiles induces differential elongation in the lower epidermal cells. This led to the discovery of the plant growth hormone auxin and the Cholodny–Went hypothesis attributing differential tropic bending to lateral auxin relocalization. In the past two decades, molecular‐genetic analyses in the model flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana has identified the principal photoreceptors for phototropism and their mechanism of activation. In addition, several protein families of auxin transporters have been identified. Despite extensive efforts, however, it still remains unclear as to how photoreceptor activation regulates lateral auxin transport to establish phototropic growth. This review aims to summarize major developments from over the last century and how these advances shape our current understanding of higher plant phototropism. Recent progress in phototropism research and the way in which this research is shedding new light on old concepts, including the Cholodny–Went hypothesis, is also highlighted.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
No phosphorylation sites associated with the first positive phototropism have been identified under low-fluence blue light.
“However, no phosphorylation sites associated with the first positive phototropism have been identified under low-fluence blue light (Sakai and Haga, 2012; Christie and Murphy, 2013).”
From The action of enhancing weak light capture via phototropic growth and chloroplast movement in plants (2022) · cites this paper as Christie and Murphy, 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 115 · Cited by 152
- Authors
- Christie, J. M., & Murphy, A. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Corresponding author
- Christie, John M.
- Murphy, Angus S.
- Venue
- American Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-46
- ISSN
- 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2197
- OpenAlex
- W2164227005
- Cited by
- 152
- References
- 115
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Botany (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/J016047/1)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Parasitism and Resistance
- Keywords
- auxin transport, photoreceptors, Arabidopsis thaliana, coleoptile, plant growth regulation
- MeSH terms
- Indoleacetic Acids, Light, Models, Biological, Plant Shoots, Phototropism, Photoreceptors, Plant
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review