The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Photosynthetic characteristics of invasive and noninvasive species of Rubus (Rosaceae)
Abstract
The prolific amount of growth and reproduction in invasive plants may be achieved by greater net photosynthesis and/or resource‐use efficiency. I tested the hypotheses that leaf‐level photosynthetic capacity and resource‐use efficiency were greater in two invasive species of Rubus as compared with two noninvasive species that have overlapping distributions in the Pacific Northwest. The invasive species had significantly higher photosynthetic capacity and maintained net photosynthesis (A) over a longer period of the year than the noninvasive species. The construction cost (CC) of leaf tissue per unit leaf mass was comparable among the four species, but the invasive species allocated less nitrogen (N) per unit leaf mass. On a leaf area basis, both leaf CC and N were higher for the invasive species. The specific leaf area (SLA) was also lower in the invasive species, indicating less photosynthetic area per gram leaf tissue. The invasive species achieved high A at lower resource investments than the noninvasive species, including having higher maximum photosynthetic rate (Amax) per unit dark respiration (Rd), greater Amax per unit leaf N (photosynthetic nitrogen‐use efficiency), and greater water‐use efficiency as measured by instantaneous rates of A per unit transpiration (A/E) and by integrated A/E inferred from stable carbon isotope ratios (δ 13 C). Using discriminant analysis, these photosynthetic characteristics were found to be powerful in distinguishing between the invasive and noninvasive Rubus. Amax and A/E were identified as the most useful variables for distinguishing between the species, and therefore, may be important factors contributing to the success of these invasive species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis
Farquhar, G. D., Ehleringer, J. R., & Hubick, K. T. (1989) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443 · Cited by 7,063
Biological Invasions by Exotic Grasses, the Grass/Fire Cycle, and Global Change
D'Antonio, C. M., & Vitousek, P. M. (1992) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.23.110192.000431 · Cited by 3,399
Hobbs, R. J., & Mooney, H. A. (1998) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.96233.x · Cited by 185
Cited by
Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions
Richards, C. L., Bossdorf, O., Muth, N. Z., Gurevitch, J., & Pigliucci, M. (2006) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00950.x · Cited by 1,456
Jaikumar, N. S., Snapp, S. S., & Sharkey, T. D. (2013) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.1300122 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Lambrecht, S. C.
- Venue
- American Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1431-1438
- ISSN
- 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2197
- OpenAlex
- W1996394236
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Photosynthetic characteristics of invasive and noninvasive species of Rubus (Rosaceae). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3732/ajb.89.9.1431
- The paper
- Lambrecht, S. C. (2002). Photosynthetic characteristics of invasive and noninvasive species of Rubus (Rosaceae). American Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.89.9.1431
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.