The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assembling the fungal tree of life: progress, classification, and evolution of subcellular traits
Abstract
Based on an overview of progress in molecular systematics of the true fungi (Fungi/Eumycota) since 1990, little overlap was found among single‐locus data matrices, which explains why no large‐scale multilocus phylogenetic analysis had been undertaken to reveal deep relationships among fungi. As part of the project “Assembling the Fungal Tree of Life” (AFTOL), results of four Bayesian analyses are reported with complementary bootstrap assessment of phylogenetic confidence based on (1) a combined two‐locus data set (nucSSU and nucLSU rDNA) with 558 species representing all traditionally recognized fungal phyla (Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Chytridiomycota, Zygomycota) and the Glomeromycota, (2) a combined three‐locus data set (nucSSU, nucLSU, and mitSSU rDNA) with 236 species, (3) a combined three‐locus data set (nucSSU, nucLSU rDNA, and RPB2) with 157 species, and (4) a combined four‐locus data set (nucSSU, nucLSU, mitSSU rDNA, and RPB2) with 103 species. Because of the lack of complementarity among single‐locus data sets, the last three analyses included only members of the Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. The four‐locus analysis resolved multiple deep relationships within the Ascomycota and Basidiomycota that were not revealed previously or that received only weak support in previous studies. The impact of this newly discovered phylogenetic structure on supraordinal classifications is discussed. Based on these results and reanalysis of subcellular data, current knowledge of the evolution of septal features of fungal hyphae is synthesized, and a preliminary reassessment of ascomal evolution is presented. Based on previously unpublished data and sequences from GenBank, this study provides a phylogenetic synthesis for the Fungi and a framework for future phylogenetic studies on fungi.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Medina, M., Collins, A. G., Silberman, J. D., & Sogin, M. L. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.171316998 · Cited by 395
The Closest Unicellular Relatives of Animals
Lang, B. F., O'Kelly, C., Nerad, T., Gray, M. W., & Burger, G. (2002) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(02)01187-9 · Cited by 326
Evolution of the fungal self-fertile reproductive life style from self-sterile ancestors
Yun, S.-H., Berbee, M. L., Yoder, O. C., & Turgeon, B. G. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.10.5592 · Cited by 248
Cited by
A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi
Hibbett, D. S., Binder, M., Bischoff, J. F., Blackwell, M., Cannon, P. F., Eriksson, O. E., Huhndorf, S., James, T., Kirk, P. M., Lücking, R., et al. (2007) · Mycological Research · doi:10.1016/j.mycres.2007.03.004 · Cited by 2,390
Self-citationPhylogenetic distribution and evolution of mycorrhizas in land plants
Wang, B., & Qiu, Y.-L. (2006) · Mycorrhiza · doi:10.1007/s00572-005-0033-6 · Cited by 1,920
The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes
Adl, S. M., Simpson, A. G. B., Lane, C. E., Lukeš, J., Bass, D., Bowser, S. S., Brown, M. W., Burki, F., Dunthorn, M., Hampl, V., et al. (2012) · Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x · Cited by 1,680
Self-citation“Phylogenetic Classification of Cordyceps and the Clavicipitaceous Fungi”
Sung, G.-H., Hywel-Jones, N. L., Sung, J.-M., Luangsa-ard, J. J., Shrestha, B., & Spatafora, J. W. (2007) · Studies in Mycology · doi:10.3114/sim.2007.57.01 · Cited by 1,077
Self-citationA fungal phylogeny based on 42 complete genomes derived from supertree and combined gene analysis.
(2006) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-6-99 · Cited by 475
Metadata
- Authors
- Lutzoni, F., Kauff, F., Cox, C. J., McLaughlin, D., Celio, G., Dentinger, B., Padamsee, M., Hibbett, D., James, T. Y., Baloch, E., Grube, M., Reeb, V., Hofstetter, V., Schoch, C., Arnold, A. E., Miadlikowska, J., Spatafora, J., Johnson, D., Hambleton, S., Crockett, M., Shoemaker, R., Sung, G., Lücking, R., Lumbsch, T., O'Donnell, K., Binder, M., Diederich, P., Ertz, D., Gueidan, C., Hansen, K., Harris, R. C., Hosaka, K., Lim, Y., Matheny, B., Nishida, H., Pfister, D., Rogers, J., Rossman, A., Schmitt, I., Sipman, H., Stone, J., Sugiyama, J., Yahr, R., & Vilgalys, R.
- Venue
- American Journal of Botany
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1446-1480
- ISSN
- 0002-9122 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2197
- OpenAlex
- W2150227862
- Cited by
- 816
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 54.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assembling the fungal tree of life: progress, classification, and evolution of subcellular traits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3732/ajb.91.10.1446
- The paper
- Lutzoni, F., Kauff, F., Cox, C. J., McLaughlin, D., Celio, G., Dentinger, B., Padamsee, M., Hibbett, D., James, T. Y., Baloch, E., Grube, M., Reeb, V., Hofstetter, V., Schoch, C., Arnold, A. E., Miadlikowska, J., Spatafora, J., Johnson, D., Hambleton, S., . . . Vilgalys, R. (2004). Assembling the fungal tree of life: progress, classification, and evolution of subcellular traits. American Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.91.10.1446
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
