The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Experimental studies on predation: Dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations
Open accessAbstract
Experimental studies on the role of dispersion in predator-prey relations was studied under controlled laboratory conditions using the phytophagous mite Eotetranychus sexmaculatus as prey, and the mite Typhlodromus occidentalis as predator. The results are a beginning toward answering some of the theoretical questions presented to population ecologists. The present data indicate that if an adequate environment is encompassed, the predator-prey relation is not necessarily self-annihilative, and that absolutely restrictive refuges are not essential. The results also support the view that more stable control of a population is likely to result in an environment of balanced heterogeneity than in one of simpler structure. In this study a predator-prey relation was maintained for three successive oscillation waves before overexploitation finally ended the relation in the most complex universe or ecosystem utilized. Some of the questions which may ultimately be answered by such studies include: Are such oscillations inherently of increasing amplitude? If so, are there commonly present forces which act to cancel this tendency? Does the presence of other significant species in addition to the two original coactors tend to stabilize or disturb the relation? What may be the effect of changes in the physical conditions upon the degree of stability or permanence of the relation? Can evidence be obtained regarding the concept that the prey, as well as the predator, may benefit from the relation? What is the order of influence on stability of such factors as shelter, food, disease, and natural enemies of other kinds?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Biodiversity
Fahrig, L. (2003) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419 · Cited by 7,879
TOWARD A METABOLIC THEORY OF ECOLOGY
Brown, J. H., Gillooly, J. F., Allen, A. P., Savage, V. M., & West, G. B. (2004) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/03-9000 · Cited by 7,779
Directions in Conservation Biology
Caughley, G. (1994) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/5542 · Cited by 2,405
Middleton, A. D., Kauffman, M. J., McWhirter, D. E., Jimenez, M. D., Cook, R. C., Cook, J. G., Albeke, S. E., Sawyer, H., & White, P. J. (2013) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12133 · Cited by 181
Self-regulation and the stability of large ecological networks
Barabás, G., Michalska-Smith, M. J., & Allesina, S. (2017) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0357-6 · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Huffaker, C. B.
- Venue
- Hilgardia
- Published
- 1958-08
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 343-383
- ISSN
- 0073-2230 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2323358873
- Cited by
- 1,359
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experimental studies on predation: Dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3733/hilg.v27n14p343
- The paper
- Huffaker, C. B. (1958). Experimental studies on predation: Dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations. Hilgardia. https://doi.org/10.3733/hilg.v27n14p343
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.