Cited by 18Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater TreatmentMosquito-borne diseases and controlUrban Stormwater Management Solutions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Managing Mosquitoes in Surface-Flow Constructed Treatment Wetlands

Open access

Abstract

Constructed treatment wetlands can provide cost-effective water quality treatment and may provide other benefits such as wildlife conservation, wetland habitat enhancement, and sites for public education and recreation. However, man-made wetlands used to treat municipal or agricultural wastewater as well as storm water often produce mosquitoes, which are a public health concern. Design features that are thought to be necessary for water quality improvement, such as shallow water and dense emergent vegetation, can cause significant mosquito production. Because many bird species are reservoirs for viral pathogens that cause diseases in humans and domesticated animals, the attraction of large numbers of birds to constructed wetlands also increases the risk of transmission of mosquito-borne viral infections to susceptible bird populations living near human residences and to humans and companion animals. The potential for conflict between wetland operators or managers and agencies charged with protecting public health is typically highest near areas of residential development and in arid regions where mosquito populations are naturally low. This publication discusses how the design and operation of surface-flow wetlands constructed primarily for water quality improvement can contribute to issues related to high populations of mosquitoes. Subsurface-flow wetlands, another type of constructed treatment wetland, are not discussed here. Surface-flow wetlands most often appear similar to a marsh containing emergent vegetation (fig. 1). Many of the recommendations discussed here also apply to man-made wetlands intended for uses other than water quality improvement. Incorporating design features to minimize mosquito production can significantly decrease mosquito abundance, lower the costs of mosquito control, and may lessen legal liability. Figure 1. A constructed treatment wetland incorporating a mixture of emergent macrophytes in shallow marshes and deep-water

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3733/ucanr.8117

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Jiannino, J. A. 2001. Evaluation of mosquito control strategies in a Southern California constructed treatment wetland. MS thesis. University of California, Riverside, Department of Entomology.
  2. Metzger, 2002, Stormwater, 3, 24
  3. Meyer, 1992, Proceedings of the California Mosquito Vector Control Association, 60, 17
  4. Mulhern, T. D., ed. 1980. A training manual for California mosquito control agencies. California Department of Health, Vector and Waste Management Section. Visalia: CMCA Press.
  5. Walton, W. E. 2002. Multipurpose constructed treatment wetlands in the arid southwestern United States: Are the benefits worth the risks? In J. Pries, ed., Treatment wetlands for water quality improvement: Quebec 2000 conference proceedings. Waterloo, ON: Pandora Press. 115–123.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • North American Wetlands and Mosquito Control

    Rey, J., Walton, W., Wolfe, R., Connelly, C., O'Connell, S., Berg, J., Sakolsky-Hoopes, G., & Laderman, A. (2012) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph9124537 · Cited by 85

    “Growth of floating vegetation is sometimes a problem that can limit the effectiveness of these deep water areas for mosquito abatement [101].”
    BackgroundSelf-citation

See all 18

Metadata

Authors
Walton, W. E.
Affiliations
University of California, Riverside (US)
Corresponding author
Walton, William E
Published
2003-11
OpenAlex
W2786050721
Cited by
18
References
7
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.82
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Locations
eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
Keywords
mosquitoes, surface flow constructed wetland, mosquito control, mosquito-borne viral disease, bird reservoirs, wetland design, emergent macrophytes, shallow water, wastewater treatment, stormwater treatment, public health risk, legal liability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review