The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (Chinese edition)
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To achieve the assumed goal, the authors conducted a review of the literature on green and sustainable healthcare published in 2013–2023 (early access) using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [40].”
From Towards Green and Sustainable Healthcare: A Literature Review and Research Agenda for Green Leadership in the Healthcare Sector (2023) · cites this paper as [40]
In the citing paper
“The following steps were guided by PRISMA guidelines (PRISMA-ScR, Supplementary Table 1)92.”
From Digital health interventions for non-communicable disease management in primary health care in low-and middle-income countries (2023) · cites this paper as [92]
In the citing paper
“This systematic review followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [76].”
From Using Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Ongoing Psychological Interventions for Emotional Problems in Real- or Close to Real-Time: A Systematic Review (2022) · cites this paper as [76]
Citations
Cites
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 · Cited by 28,164
Self-citationGRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad · Cited by 23,305
Moher, D., Cook, D. J., Eastwood, S., Olkin, I., Rennie, D., & Stroup, D. F. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04149-5 · Cited by 4,826
Self-citationThe Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration
Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., Moher, D., Egger, M., Davidoff, F., Elbourne, D., Gøtzsche, P. C., Lang, T., & for the CONSORT Group (2001) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-134-8-200104170-00012 · Cited by 3,835
Self-citationVandenbroucke, J. P., Elm, E. V., Altman, D. G., Gøtzsche, P. C., Mulrow, C. D., Pocock, S. J., Poole, C., Schlesselman, J. J., Egger, M., & initiative, F. T. S. (2007) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010-w1 · Cited by 3,543
Chan, A.-W., Hróbjartsson, A., Haahr, M. T., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Altman, D. G. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.291.20.2457 · Cited by 1,845
Replication validity of genetic association studies
Ioannidis, J. P. A., Ntzani, E., Trikalinos, T. A., & Contopoulos‐Ioannidis, D. G. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng749 · Cited by 1,834
The case of the misleading funnel plot
Lau, J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Terrin, N., Schmid, C. H., & Olkin, I. (2006) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.333.7568.597 · Cited by 1,766
Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests
Deeks, J. J. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7305.157 · Cited by 1,345
Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials
Sacks, H. S., Berrier, J., Reitman, D., Ancona-Berk, V. A., & Chalmers, T. C. (1987) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198702193160806 · Cited by 1,257
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–908 of 908
TAHA, A. M., Hegab, A., Yousef, M., Abdelhakam, M., & Dahshan, S. A. (2026) · Chirurgia · doi:10.23736/s0394-9508.25.05860-7
Pu, X., Sun, Z., Ji, W., Yin, X., Li, Y., Zhang, H., Zhang, J., Chen, X., & Xia, J. (2026) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2026.1928717
Wang, X., Zheng, S., & Du, T. (2026) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2026.1922633
Qin, Z., Liao, J., Peng, X., Teng, Y., Wan, B., & Zong, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2026.1950298
Conceptualising corruption in the extractive industries: Evidence from a systematic review
Moisé, G. M. (2026) · Resources Policy · doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2026.106066
Dolatshah, L., Shahriari, H., Derakhshandeh, A., Salehi‐Abargouei, A., & Sadeh, M. (2026) · Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.5812/jjm-171607
Yang, J., Antwi‐Afari, M. F., Tao, X., Chen, K., & Bao, Z. (2026) · Engineering Construction & Architectural Management · doi:10.1108/ecam-08-2025-1256
Li, X., Sui, C.-L., Zhang, B., 白宇泉, Zhao, Q., & Xu, L. (2026) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2026.1939223
Metadata
- Authors
- Moher, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Ottawa (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Moher, D
- ORCID
- Moher, D
- Venue
- Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine
- Published
- 2009-09-15
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 889-896
- ISSN
- 1672-1977 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2023013236
- Cited by
- 909
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 42 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 93 · 2022: 99 · 2021: 149 · 2020: 119 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 0.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Chinese Integrative Medicine (publishedVersion)
- IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Keywords
- PRISMA statement, reporting guidelines, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, reporting quality, Chinese version
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
