The integration of artificial intelligence in education: opportunities and challenges
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To explore the current and potential role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the educational sector, addressing its benefits and potential challenges. Method: A comprehensive review of the existing literature and applications of AI in various fields, with a specific focus on its implications for education. Results: AI has seamlessly integrated into various aspects of our daily lives, from automated systems in vehicles to personalized online advertisements. In the realm of education, AI promises to enhance the teaching and learning experience. It aims to supplement, not replace, educators by making the learning process more engaging and efficient. AI systems can provide feedback on student performance, highlighting areas of improvement, and ensuring inclusivity for students with special needs or language barriers. Additionally, AI can automate many administrative tasks, allowing educators more time for lesson planning and instructional improvement. Conclusions: While AI presents numerous advantages for the educational sector, its integration should be approached with caution. Both educators and students need preparation for this technological shift to maximize its benefits and mitigate potential challenges. Implications: The onus is on governments, educational institutions, and related organizations to facilitate the smooth integration of AI in education. Proper training and awareness are essential to ensure that AI is utilized responsibly and effectively in educational settings.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Socio-emotional concerns highlight fears that over-automation could weaken empathy, collaboration, and interpersonal learning.
“Additionally, socio-emotional concerns highlight fears that over-automation could weaken empathy, collaboration, and interpersonal learning (Lampou, 2023).”
From Teachers' Experiences with AI in K–12 Education: Opportunities and Challenges (2026) · cites this paper as Lampou, 2023
Cites
Artificial intelligence, at Africa’s door
Marwala, T. (2019) · The UNESCO Courier · doi:10.18356/d94175df-en · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Integrating generative AI in university teaching and learning: A model for balanced guidelines
Cacho, R. (2024) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v28i3.4508 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Teachers' Experiences with AI in K–12 Education: Opportunities and Challenges
Güneş Metin, K., & Çetin, M. (2026) · Journal of Educational Technology Systems · doi:10.1177/00472395261415889
- Authors
- Lampou, R.
- Affiliations
- Ministry of Education and Religious Affairs (GR)
- Corresponding author
- Lampou, Rania
- ORCID
- Lampou, Rania
- Venue
- Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Publisher
- Editora Alumniin
- Published
- 2023-08-18
- Volume
- 4
- Pages
- e15
- ISSN
- 2965-4688 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4386021471
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 6
- FWCI
- 19.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Technology and Pedagogy
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in education, AI integration challenges, personalized learning, inclusive education, special needs students, language barriers, administrative automation, teacher workload, responsible AI use
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review