Cited by 81Artificial Intelligence in EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEducational Technology and Pedagogy

The integration of artificial intelligence in education: opportunities and challenges

Open access
Lampou, Rania·2023·Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education

Abstract

Objective: To explore the current and potential role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the educational sector, addressing its benefits and potential challenges. Method: A comprehensive review of the existing literature and applications of AI in various fields, with a specific focus on its implications for education. Results: AI has seamlessly integrated into various aspects of our daily lives, from automated systems in vehicles to personalized online advertisements. In the realm of education, AI promises to enhance the teaching and learning experience. It aims to supplement, not replace, educators by making the learning process more engaging and efficient. AI systems can provide feedback on student performance, highlighting areas of improvement, and ensuring inclusivity for students with special needs or language barriers. Additionally, AI can automate many administrative tasks, allowing educators more time for lesson planning and instructional improvement. Conclusions: While AI presents numerous advantages for the educational sector, its integration should be approached with caution. Both educators and students need preparation for this technological shift to maximize its benefits and mitigate potential challenges. Implications: The onus is on governments, educational institutions, and related organizations to facilitate the smooth integration of AI in education. Proper training and awareness are essential to ensure that AI is utilized responsibly and effectively in educational settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.37497/rev.artif.intell.educ.v4i00.15

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Socio-emotional concerns highlight fears that over-automation could weaken empathy, collaboration, and interpersonal learning.

    “Additionally, socio-emotional concerns highlight fears that over-automation could weaken empathy, collaboration, and interpersonal learning (Lampou, 2023).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lampou, R.
Affiliations
Ministry of Education and Religious Affairs (GR)
Corresponding author
Lampou, Rania
Venue
Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education
Published
2023-08-18
Volume
4
Pages
e15
ISSN
2965-4688 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386021471
Cited by
81
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 6
FWCI
19.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Review of Artificial Intelligence in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Technology and Pedagogy
Keywords
artificial intelligence in education, AI integration challenges, personalized learning, inclusive education, special needs students, language barriers, administrative automation, teacher workload, responsible AI use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review