Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 100Middle East and Rwanda ConflictsMiddle East Politics and SocietyNatural Resources and Economic Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Royal Factionalism and Political Liberalization in Qatar

Kamrava, Mehran·2009·The Middle East Journal
DOI 10.3751/63.3.13
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Qatar's much publicized liberalization campaign that began in the mid-1990s was a direct result of efforts by the new Amir, Shaykh Hamad, to compensate for his fragile base of support within the ruling Al Thani family by appealing to a broader base of Qataris and also to the international community. Historically, the Al Thani family had been one of the only centers of potential opposition to the reigning Amir, with merchant families or the religious establishment having been politically neutralized due to a variety of historical and structural reasons. Nevertheless, in relation to both groups the state has pursued a nuanced policy of simultaneous co-option and political incapacitation. Meanwhile, steady rises in oil and gas revenues allowed the state to significantly deepen its capacity in relation to society, and, by doing so, to ensure that groups from within civil society did not rise to positions of prominence. Within the Al Thanis, Shaykh Hamad undertook a number of significant changes, not the least of which was the creation of new institutions and offices that were staffed by his loyal supporters, including some of his sons and daughters. He also streamlined the line of succession to include only his own descendants. With the traditional political disquiet of the Al Thanis thus silenced, at least for now, all talks of liberalization have been dropped and the Qatari state remains fundamentally autocratic.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3751/63.3.13

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kamrava, M.
Corresponding author
Kamrava, Mehran
ORCID
Kamrava, Mehran
Venue
The Middle East Journal
Publisher
The Middle East Journal
Published
2009-07-01
Volume
63
Issue
3
Pages
401-420
ISSN
  • 0026-3141 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-3461
DOI
10.3751/63.3.13
OpenAlex
W2040318166
Cited by
100
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Middle East Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Middle East Politics and Society
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Natural Resources and Economic Development
Keywords
political liberalization, Qatar, authoritarian regimes, merchant families, religious establishment, oil and gas revenues, civil society, state capacity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.