CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 18

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Digital Repatriation as a Decolonizing Practice in the Archaeological Archive

Krupa, Krystiana L., Grimm, Kelsey T.·2021·Across the Disciplines
DOI 10.37514/atd-j.2021.18.1-2.05
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.37514/atd-j.2021.18.1-2.05

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Krupa and Grimm (2021) argue that repatriation should include NAGPRA-related documents that contain data, knowledge, and information about Native American culture and histories.

    “Krupa and Grimm (2021) make a compelling argument as to why repatriation should include NAGPRA-related documents that contain data, knowledge, and information about Native American culture and histories, especially considering Indigenous rights outlined in UNDRIP.”

    From Considerations for Developing Collaborative Policies on NAGPRA, Repatriation, and the Care of Ancestors and Cultural Items (2025) · cites this paper as Krupa and Grimm 2021

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Alpert-Abrams, Hannah. (2019). Surrogate return: Copying for the collective good [Conference presentation]. SHARP 2019, Amherst, MA, United States. http://www.halperta.com/conferences.html
  2. Anderson, Jane. (2018). Negotiating who "owns" Penobscot Culture. Anthropological Quarterly 91(1), 267-305. doi:10.1353/anq.2018.0008 · DOI
  3. Black, Glenn A.. (1967). Angel site: An archaeological, historical, and ethnological study. Indianapolis: Indiana Historical Society.
  4. Boast, Robin. (2011). Neocolonial collaboration: Museum as contact zone revisited. Museum Anthropology, 34(1), 56-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1379.2010.01107.x · DOI
  5. Boast, Robin & Enote, Jim. (2013). Virtual repatriation: It is neither virtual nor repatriation. In P. F. Biehl and C. Prescott (Eds.), Heritage in the context of globalization: Europe and the Americas (pp. 103-113). Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6077-0_13 · DOI
  6. Brown, Michael Fobes. (2003). Who owns native culture? Harvard University Press.
  7. Bruchac, Margaret. (2018). Broken chains of custody: Possessing, dispossessing, and repossessing lost wampum belts. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 162(1), 56-105. https://www.amphilsoc.org/sites/default/files/2018-08/attachments/Bruchac.pdf
  8. Buckland, Michael. (1991). Information as thing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 351- 360. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199106)42:5%3C351::AID-ASI5%3E3.0.CO;2-3 · DOI
  9. Caswell, Michelle. (2016). "The archive" is not an archives: On acknowledging the intellectual contributions of archival studies. Reconstruction, 16(1). https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7bn4v1fk
  10. Caswell, Michelle, Punzalan, Ricardo, & Sangwand, T-Kay. (2017). Critical archival studies: An introduction. Journal of Critical Library and Information Studies, 1(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.24242/jclis.v1i2.50 · DOI
  11. Christen, Kimberly. (2011). Opening archives: Respectful repatriation. The American Archivist, 74(1), 185-210. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23079006 Curation of Federally-Owned and Administered Archaeological Collections, 36 C.F.R. § 79 (1990). · DOI
  12. Cushman, Ellen. (2013). Wampum, Sequoyan, and story: Decolonizing the digital archive. College English 76(2), 115-135. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24238145 · DOI
  13. Doyle, Ann M., Lawson, Kimberley, & Dupont, Sarah. (2015). Indigenization of knowledge organization at the Xwi7xwa Library. Journal of Library & Information Studies, 13(2), 107-134. https://doi.org/10.6182/jlis.2015.13(2).107 Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma (ESTO). (2017). MN-00-17-0009-17. Institute of Museum and Library Services. · DOI
  14. Faulkhead, Shanon. (2010). Connecting through records: Narratives of Koorie Victoria. Archives and Manuscripts, 37(2), 60-88.
  15. Fenton, William N. (1989). Return of eleven Wampum belts to the six nations Iroquois Confederacy on Grand River, Canada. Ethnohistory, 36(4), 392-410. https://www.jstor.org/stable/482654 · DOI
  16. First Archivist Circle. (2007, April 9). Protocols for Native American archival materials. http://www2.nau.edu/libnap- p/protocols.html
  17. Friberg, Christina M., Pope, Melody K., Sievert, April, St. Germain, Jennifer, Grimm, Kelsey T., & Herrmann, Edward W. (2020). Creation of knowledge and curation of legacy; Preserving angel mounds collections and data. The SAA Archaeological Record, 20(3), 12-18. http://onlinedigeditions.com/publication/?i=660136&article_id=3673989&view=articleBrowser&ver=html5 Great Lakes-Ohio Valley Ethnohistory (GLOVE) collection [finding aid], Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology (formerly the Glenn A. Black Laboratory of Archaeology), Indiana University, Bloomington. http://purl.dlib.indiana.edu/iudl/findingaids/ewv/VAD1751 Great Lakes -Ohio Valley ethnohistory collection, 1953-1966. Archives online at Indiana University. http://webapp1.dlib.indiana.edu/findingaids/view?doc.view=entire_text&docId=VAD1751
  18. Henderson, Martha J. (2016, November 3). Wampum Belts: More than a decorative accessory. The Shawnee News- Star. https://www.news-star.com/news/20161103/wampum-belts-more-than-decorative- accessory#:~:text=%E2%80%9CWampum%20belts%20were%20a%20document,in%20the%20Northeastern%2 0United%20States.
  19. Jansari, Sushma, & Minott, Rachael. (2020, January 13). Decolonising museum practice with Rachael Minott [podcast]. The Wonderhouse. https://thewonderhouse.co.uk/rachael-minott
  20. Lonetree, Amy. (2012). Decolonizing museums: representing native America in national and tribal museums. University of North Carolina Press. ATD, VOL18(ISSUE1/2)
  21. Mihesuah, Devon A. (2000). American Indians, anthropologists, pothunters, and repatriation: Ethical, religious, and political differences. American Indian Quarterly, 20(2), 229-237. https://doi.org/10.2307/1185702 · DOI
  22. Miron, Rose. (2018). Fighting for the Tribal Bible: Mohican politics of self-representation in public history. Native American and Indigenous Studies, 5(2), 91-122. https://doi.org/10.5749/natiindistudj.5.2.0091 Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, 25 U.S.C. § 3001 et seq. (1990). · DOI
  23. Perrin, Kathy, Brown, Duncan, Lange, Guus, Bibby, David, Carlsson, Annika, Degraeve, Ann, Kuna, Martin, Larsson, Ylva, Palsdottir, Solborg U., Stoll-Tucker, Bettina, Dunning, Cynthia, & von Bieberstein, Aurelie R. (2014). A standard and guide to best practice for archaeological archiving in Europe. European Archaeological Council. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278848862_A_Standard_and_Guide_to_Best_Practice_for_Archaeo logical_Archiving_in_Europe
  24. Sievert, April. (2017). Experimenting with an American Indian resources and services portal [Unpublished manuscript on file at the Indiana University Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology].
  25. Smith, Linda T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples, second edition. Otago University Press. Society for American Archaeology. (No date). What is Archaeology? https://www.saa.org/about-archaeology/what- is-archaeology Society of American Archivists. (No date). Archive (definition n.
  26. Dictionary of Archives Terminology. https://dictionary.archivists.org/entry/archive.html Society of American Archivists. (2016, September 12). What Are Archives? https://www2.archivists.org/about- archives Society of American Archivists. (2020). SAA core values statement and code of ethics (2005, amended effective January 2012 and August 2020). https://www2.archivists.org/statements/saa-core-values-statement-and-code- of-ethics
  27. Tuck, Eve & Yang, Wayne K. (2012). "Decolonization is not a metaphor." Decolonization: Indigeneity, education & society, 1(1), 1-40.
  28. Turner, Hannah. (2015). Decolonizing ethnographic documentation: A critical history of the early museum catalogs at the Smithsonian's National Museum of Natural History. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 53(5/6), 658-676. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2015.1010112 · DOI
  29. Underhill, Karen. (2006). "Protocols for Native American archival material." RBM: A Journal of Rare Books, Manuscripts, and Cultural Heritage, 7(2), 134-145. https://doi.org/10.5860/rbm.7.2.267 · DOI
  30. Yale, Elizabeth. (2015). The history of archives: The state of the discipline. Book History, 18, 332-359. https://doi.org/10.1353/bh.2015.0007 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Krupa, K. L., & Grimm, K. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign
  • Indiana University
Venue
Across the Disciplines
Publisher
The WAC Clearinghouse
Published
2021
Volume
18
Issue
1-2
Pages
47-58
ISSN
1554-8244
DOI
10.37514/atd-j.2021.18.1-2.05
Cited by
18
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review