Auditory, tactile, and multisensory cues facilitate search for dynamic visual stimuli
Open accessAbstract
Presenting an auditory or tactile cue in temporal synchrony with a change in the color of a visual target can facilitate participants' visual search performance. In the present study, we compared the magnitude of unimodal auditory, vibrotactile, and bimodal (i.e., multisensory) cuing benefits when the nonvisual cues were presented in temporal synchrony with the changing of the target's color (Experiments 1 and 2). The target (a horizontal or vertical line segment) was presented among a number of distractors (tilted line segments) that also changed color at various times. In Experiments 3 and 4, the cues were also made spatially informative with regard to the location of the visual target. The unimodal and bimodal cues gave rise to an equivalent (significant) facilitation of participants' visual search performance relative to a no-cue baseline condition. Making the unimodal auditory and vibrotactile cues spatially informative produced further performance improvements (on validly cued trials), as compared with cues that were spatially uninformative or otherwise spatially invalid. A final experiment was conducted in order to determine whether cue location (close to versus far from the visual display) would influence participants' visual search performance. Auditory cues presented close to the visual search display were found to produce significantly better performance than cues presented over headphones. Taken together, these results have implications for the design of nonvisual and multisensory warning signals used in complex visual displays.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multisensory integration can enhance the ability to detect a target stimulus.
“This means that multisensory integration can enhance the ability to detect a target stimulus.”
From The impact of multisensory integration and perceptual load in virtual reality settings on performance, workload and presence (2021) · cites this paper as [13]
Cites
Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030 · Cited by 2,487 · see citing works
Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations
Vicente, K. J., & Rasmussen, J. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/21.156574 · Cited by 1,084 · see citing works
Audio–visual simultaneity judgments
Zampini, M., Guest, S., Shore, D. I., & Spence, C. (2005) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03193329 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Marucci, M., Di Flumeri, G., Borghini, G., Sciaraffa, N., Scandola, M., Pavone, E. F., Babiloni, F., Betti, V., & Aricò, P. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-84196-8 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Multisensory Integration in Complete Unawareness: Evidence From Audiovisual Congruency Priming
Faivre, N., Mudrik, L., Schwartz, N., & Koch, C. (2014) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614547916 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ngo, M. K., & Spence, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Ngo, Mary Kim
- ORCID
- Spence, Charles
- Venue
- Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1654-1665
- ISSN
- 1943-3921 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-393X
- OpenAlex
- W2045450941
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 9.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Attention Perception & Psychophysics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Oxford
- Clarendon Fund
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- visual search, auditory cues, vibrotactile cues, multisensory cues, temporal synchronization, color change detection
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attention, Auditory Perception, Color Perception, Cues, Discrimination, Psychological, Female, Humans, Male, Orientation, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reaction Time, Touch, Vibration, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review