Cited by 133Memory Processes and InfluencesSpatial Cognition and NavigationGeography Education and Pedagogy

Testing beyond words: using tests to enhance visuospatial map learning

Open access
Carpenter, Shana K., Pashler, Harold·2007·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Abstract

Psychological research shows that learning can be powerfully enhanced through testing, but this finding has so far been confined to memory tasks requiring verbal responses. We explored whether testing can enhance learning of visuospatial information in maps. Fifty subjects each studied two maps, one through conventional study, and the other through computer-prompted tests. For the tests, the subjects were repeatedly presented with the same map with one feature deleted (e.g., a road or a river), and they tried to covertly recall the missing feature and its location. Subjects' map drawings after 30 min were significantly better for maps learned through tests in comparison with maps learned through the same amount of time devoted to conventional study. These results suggest that the testing effect is not limited to the types of memory that require discrete, verbal responses, and that utilizing covert retrievals may allow the effect to be extended to a variety of complex, nonverbal learning tasks.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03194092

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The benefits of testing have been shown to support non-verbal visual and spatial information, including locations on maps, identifying birds, name-face associations, statistics, and spatial locations of objects.

    “However, the benefits of testing have been shown to support non-verbal visual and spatial information, including locations on maps (Carpenter and Pashler, 2007; Rohrer et al., 2010), identifying birds (Jacoby et al., 2010), name-face associations (Morris and Fritz, 2002; Helder and Shaughnessy, 2008), statistics (Szpunar et al., 2013), and spatial locations of objects (Sommer et al., 2008).”

    From Neural Correlates of Long-Term Memory Enhancement Following Retrieval Practice (2021) · cites this paper as Carpenter and Pashler, 2007

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 133

Authors
Carpenter, S. K., & Pashler, H.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Carpenter, Shana K.
Venue
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
2007-06
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
474-478
ISSN
  • 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5320
OpenAlex
W2010840770
Cited by
133
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Education
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01mh061549-03)
  • Institute of Education Sciences (R305H040108)
  • University of California, San Diego
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH61549)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geography Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
testing effect, retrieval practice, visuospatial learning, map learning, nonverbal memory, map drawing, spatial memory
MeSH terms
California, Geography, Humans, Language, Learning, Memory, Photic Stimulation, Space Perception, Teaching, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review