The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: Fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Simplex Method for Function Minimization
Nelder, J. A., & Mead, R. (1965) · The Computer Journal · doi:10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308 · Cited by 28,905
Ratcliff, R. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.2.59 · Cited by 4,513
Self-citationHandbook of perception and human performance
Boff, K. R., Kaufman, L., & Thomas, J. P. (1986) · Wiley eBooks · Cited by 4,031
Modeling Response Times for Two-Choice Decisions
Ratcliff, R., & Rouder, J. N. (1998) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00067 · Cited by 1,478
Self-citationGroup reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics.
Ratcliff, R. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.86.3.446 · Cited by 1,031
Self-citationInformation theory of choice-reaction times
Laming, D. (1968) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 945
How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing.
Roberts, S., & Pashler, H. (2000) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.107.2.358 · Cited by 875
Ratcliff, R., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2002) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196302 · Cited by 838
Self-citationModels for Choice-Reaction Time
Stone, M. (1960) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02289729 · Cited by 629
Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time.
Ratcliff, R., Van Zandt, T., & McKoon, G. (1999) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.106.2.261 · Cited by 591
Self-citation
Cited by
The Diffusion Decision Model: Theory and Data for Two-Choice Decision Tasks
Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420 · Cited by 3,059
Self-citationDiffusion decision model: Current issues and history
Ratcliff, R., Smith, P. L., Brown, S. D., & McKoon, G. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.007 · Cited by 1,630
Self-citationThe simplest complete model of choice response time: Linear ballistic accumulation
Brown, S. D., & Heathcote, A. (2008) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.12.002 · Cited by 1,123
Ratcliff, R., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2002) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03196302 · Cited by 838
Self-citationTwo-stage dynamic signal detection: A theory of choice, decision time, and confidence.
Pleskac, T. J., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2010) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0019737 · Cited by 722
Metadata
- Authors
- Ratcliff, R.
- Venue
- Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
- Published
- 2002-06
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 278-291
- ISSN
- 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-5320
- OpenAlex
- W2027900643
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 3.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: Fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3758/bf03196283
- The paper
- Ratcliff, R. (2002). A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: Fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196283
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
