Cited by 112Language, Metaphor, and CognitionAI-based Problem Solving and PlanningCreativity in Education and Neuroscience

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Visual representation in analogical problem solving

Open access
Beveridge, M., Parkins, E.·1987·Memory & Cognition

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03197721

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Bochenski, I. M. (1962). On analogy. In I. M. Bochenski (Ed.),Logicophilosophical studies (pp. 97–117). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
  2. Nall, L. (1983).Dimensions of metaphor comprehensionin third, fifth and seventh graders. Unpublished master’s thesis, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC.
  3. Palmer, S. E. (1976). The nature of perceptual representation: An ex-armination of the analog/propositional controversy. In R. C. Schank & B. L. Nash-Webber (Eds.),Theoretical issues in natural language processing (pp. 165–172). Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek, and Newman
  4. Shepard, R. N. (1975). Form, formation and transformation of interhal representations In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Informationprocessing and cognition (pp. 87–122). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  5. Sloman, A. (1976). Afterthought on analogical representation. In R. C. Schank & B. L. Nash-Webber (Eds.),Theoretical issues in natural language processing (pp. 107–110). Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek, and Newman.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 112

Metadata

Authors
Beveridge, M., & Parkins, E.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Venue
Memory & Cognition
Published
1987-05
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
230-237
ISSN
  • 0090-502X (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5946
OpenAlex
W2022334156
Cited by
112
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Memory & Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Keywords
analogical reasoning, visual representation, analogical problem solving, radiation problems, spatial problem solving, retrieval cues
MeSH terms
Child, Cues, Humans, Problem Solving, Space Perception, Vision, Ocular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review