CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 50

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Modality differences in short-term memory for rhythms

Collier, Geoffrey L., Logan, Gordon·2000·Memory & Cognition
DOI 10.3758/bf03201243
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03201243

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Balch, W. R., &Muscattelli, D. L. (1986). The interaction of modality condition and presentation rate in short-term contour recognition.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 351–358. · DOI
  2. Bregman, A. S. (1990).Auditory scene analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. · DOI
  3. Collier, G. L., &Wright, C. E. (1995). Temporal rescaling of simple and complex ratios in rhythmic tapping.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 602–627. · DOI
  4. Crowder, R. G., &Greene, R. L. (1987). On the remembrance of times past: The irregular list technique.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,116, 265–278. · DOI
  5. Essens, P. J., &Povel, D. J. (1985). Metrical and nonmetrical representations of temporal patterns.Perception & Psychophysics,37, 1–7. · DOI
  6. Glenberg, A. M., Eberhardt, K. A., &Belden, T. M. (1987). The role of visual interference in producing the long-term modality effect.Memory & Cognition,15, 504–510. · DOI
  7. Glenberg, A. M., &Fernandez, A. (1988). Evidence for auditory temporal distinctiveness: Modality effects in order and frequency judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology,14, 728–739.
  8. Glenberg, A. M., &Jona, M. (1991). Temporal coding in rhythm tasks revealed by modality effects.Memory & Cognition,19, 514–522. · DOI
  9. Glenberg, A. M., Mann, S., Altman, L., Forman, T., &Procise, S. (1989). Modality effects in the coding and reproduction of rhythms.Memory & Cognition,17, 373–383. · DOI
  10. Glenberg, A. M., &Swanson, N. G. (1986). A temporal distinctiveness theory of recency and modality effects.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,12, 3–15. · DOI
  11. Martin, J. G. (1972). Rhythmic (hierarchical) versus serial structure in speech and other behavior.Psychological Review,79, 487–509. · DOI
  12. Penney, C. G. (1980). Order of report in bisensory verbal short-term memory.Canadian Journal of Psychology,34, 190–195. · DOI
  13. Penney, C. G. (1989). Modality effects and the structure of short-term verbal memory.Memory & Cognition,17, 398–422. · DOI
  14. Penney, C. G., &Butt, A. K. (1986). Within- and between-modality associations in probed recall: A test of the separate-streams hypothesis.Canadian Journal of Psychology,40, 1–11. · DOI
  15. Schab, F. R., &Crowder, R. G. (1989). Accuracy of temporal coding: Auditory—visual comparisons.Memory & Cognition,17, 384–397. · DOI
  16. Watkins, M. J., LeCompte, M. N., &Fish, S. B. (1992). Short-term memory for the timing of auditory and visual signals.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,18, 931–937. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Collier, G. L., & Logan, G.
Venue
Memory & Cognition
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2000-07
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
529-538
ISSN
  • 0090-502X
  • 1532-5946
DOI
10.3758/bf03201243
Cited by
50
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review