Cited by 65Phonetics and Phonology ResearchLanguage Development and DisordersCategorization, perception, and language

Internal structure of voicing categories in early infancy

Open access
Miller, Joanne L., Eimas, Peter D.·1996·Perception & Psychophysics

Abstract

It is well established that young infants process speech in terms of perceptual categories that closely correspond to the phonetic categories of adult language users. Recently, Kuhl (1991) has provided evidence that this correspondence is not limited to the region of category boundaries: At least by 6-7 months of age, vowel categories of infants, like those of adults, have an internal perceptual structure. In the current experiments, which focused on a consonantal contrast, we found evidence of internally structured categories in even younger infants-3-4 months of age. The implications of these findings for the nature of the infant's earliest language-universal categories are discussed, as is the role of exposure to the native language in shaping these categories over the course of development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03207549

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The initial perceptual biases shown by infants in tests of categorical perception, as well as asymmetries in perception seen in infancy, produce a contouring of the perceptual space that is universal.

    “The important point regarding development is that the initial perceptual biases shown by infants in tests of categorical perception (12–16), as well as asymmetries in perception seen in infancy (80, 81), produce a contouring of the perceptual space that is universal.”

    From A new view of language acquisition (2000) · cites this paper as [81]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 57 · Cited by 65

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. ASLIN, R N., & PiSONI, D. B. (1980). Some developmental processes in speech perception. In G. H. Yeni-Komshian, 1. F.Kavanagh, & C. A. Ferguson (Eds.), Child phonology: Perception (Vol. 2, pp. 67-96). New York: Academic Press.
  2. MEDIN, D. L., & BARSALOU, L. W. (1987). Categorization processes and categorical perception. In S. Hamad (Ed.), Categorical perception: The groundwork ofcognition (pp. 455-490). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. MILLER, 1. L. (1977). Properties offeature detectors for VaT: The voice- less channel of analysis. Journal ofthe Acoustical Society ofAmer- ica, 62, 641-648.
  4. WERKER, J. E (1994). Cross-language speech perception: Developmen- tal change does not involve loss. In 1. C. Goodman & H. C. Nusbaum (Eds.), The development of speech perception: The transition from speech sounds to spoken words (pp. 93-120). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Authors
Miller, J. L., & Eimas, P. D.
Affiliations
  • Northeastern University (US)
  • Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Miller, Joanne L.
Venue
Perception & Psychophysics
Published
1996-08
Volume
58
Issue
8
Pages
1157-1167
ISSN
  • 0031-5117 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5962
OpenAlex
W2087826769
Cited by
65
References
57
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Perception & Psychophysics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hd005331-27)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC-00130)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD 05331)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
Keywords
infant speech perception, voicing, phonetic categories, category structure, early infancy, language universals
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Face, Female, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Humans, Infant, Language Development, Male, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Phonetics, Speech Acoustics, Speech Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review