The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The lateralized readiness potential as an on-line measure of central response activation processes
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Mechanistically, this finding fits with models in which response preparation is not a discrete endpoint of cognition, but a continuous process through which partial perceptual and decisional information is progressively transmitted to the motor system [143,144,145].”
From Electrophysiological Correlates of Cognitive Dysfunction in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD): A Systematic and Mechanistic Review of EEG, ERP, and QEEG Evidence (2026) · cites this paper as [145]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The LRP is generally interpreted as an electrophysiological marker of lateralised central motor activation, reflecting the preferential preparation of the response hand before or around response execution [143,144,145,146].”
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Stimulus-locked LRP measures are typically more informative about the timing of response selection and premotor preparation, whereas response-locked LRP activity reflects processes closer to response execution, including the final buildup of motor activation before overt movement [145,146,147,148].”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The ten-twenty electrode system of the international federation
Jasper, H. H. (1958) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · Cited by 6,567
WALTER, W. G., COOPER, R., ALDRIDGE, V. J., McCALLUM, W. C., & WINTER, A. L. (1964) · Nature · doi:10.1038/203380a0 · Cited by 2,446
Chronometric explorations of mind
Posner, M. I. (1978) · Cited by 2,441
Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-a model and taxonomy
Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.97.2.253 · Cited by 1,970
Kornhuber, H. H., & Deecke, L. (1965) · Pflügers Archiv - European Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1007/bf00412364 · Cited by 1,902
Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search
LUCK, S. J., & HILLYARD, S. A. (1994) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1994.tb02218.x · Cited by 1,485
Reactions toward the source of stimulation
Simon, J. R. (1969) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0027448 · Cited by 1,229
Spatial filtering during visual search: Evidence from human electrophysiology.
Luck, S. J., & Hillyard, S. A. (1994) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.5.1000 · Cited by 1,116
The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity
Eimer, M. (1996) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(96)95711-9 · Cited by 1,018
de Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. J. (1994) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.20.4.731 · Cited by 1,001
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Picton, T. W., Bentin, S., Berg, P., Donchin, E., Hillyard, S. A., Johnson, R., Miller, G. A., Ritter, W., Ruchkin, D. S., Rugg, M. D., et al. (2000) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3720127 · Cited by 2,157
Internal and External Influences on the Rate of Sensory Evidence Accumulation in the Human Brain
Kelly, S. P., & O'Connell, R. G. (2013) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3355-13.2013 · Cited by 455
Going AWOL in the Brain: Mind Wandering Reduces Cortical Analysis of External Events
Smallwood, J., Beach, E., Schooler, J. W., & Handy, T. C. (2007) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20037 · Cited by 555
“…scalp potential develops directly over the motor cortex (or electrode sites C3/ C4) in the cerebral hemisphere contralateral to the responding hand—an electrophysiological indicator of central motor activation associated with the lateralized readiness potential (LRP; for a review, see Eimer, 1998).”
BackgroundA parietal-premotor network for movement intention and motor awareness
Desmurget, M., & Sirigu, A. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.08.001 · Cited by 370
How many trials does it take to get a significant ERP effect? It depends
Boudewyn, M. A., Luck, S. J., Farrens, J. L., & Kappenman, E. S. (2017) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.13049 · Cited by 352
“The LRP is an ERP that is associated with the selection and preparation of a lateralized manual response (see Eimer, 1998; Smulders & Miller, 2012, for reviews).”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Eimer, M.
- Venue
- Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 146-156
- ISSN
- 0743-3808 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5970
- OpenAlex
- W2113078992
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 3.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers (publishedVersion)
- BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Free Will and Agency
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- lateralized readiness potential, motor cortex, event-related potentials, motor asymmetry, difference waves
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review