Sex, race, age, and beauty as factors in recognition of faces
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The rater's age does not exhibit a significant correlation with perceived attractiveness.
“Conversely, the rater’s age (β5) does not exhibit a significant correlation with perceived attractiveness, which is aligned with previous research [67,68] and in contradiction with what other authors have reported [69].”
From What is beautiful is still good: the attractiveness halo effect in the era of beauty filters (2024) · cites this paper as [67]
The Results report that the rater’s age was not a statistically significant main effect for face recognition, not for perceived attractiveness. The Stimulus Material section says beauty ratings provided data for a separate study; the passages on perceived beauty address its effect on recognition. Our copy does not report whether rater age correlates with attractiveness ratings. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- GOLDSTEIN, A. G.. & CHANCE, J. E. Recognition of children's faces. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1965, 20, 547-548.
- HOWELLS, T. H. A study of ability to recognize faces. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology, 1938, 33, 124-127.
- MALPASS, n, S., & KRAVITZ, J. Recognition for faces of own and other race. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1969, 13, 330-335.
- SEELEMAN, V. The influence of attitude upon remembering of pictorial material. Archives of Psychology, 1940, 36, 258-268.
- WINER, B. J. Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962. (Accepted for publication May 19, 1971.)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What is beautiful is still good: the attractiveness halo effect in the era of beauty filters
Gulati, A., Martínez-Garcia, M., Fernández, D., Lozano, M. A., Lepri, B., & Oliver, N. (2024) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.240882 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cross, J. F., Cross, J., & Daly, J.
- Affiliations
- Saint Louis University (US)
- Venue
- Perception & Psychophysics
- Published
- 1971-11
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 393-396
- ISSN
- 0031-5117 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5962
- OpenAlex
- W2079482920
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 2.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Perception & Psychophysics (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Keywords
- face recognition (cognition), sex differences, racial differences, age differences, perception of beauty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
