The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding.
Biederman, I. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.2.115 · Cited by 5,621
Cited by
Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex
Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (1999) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/14819 · Cited by 3,309
The objects of action and perception
Goodale, M. A., & Keith Humphrey, G. (1998) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00017-1 · Cited by 438
Updating egocentric representations in human navigation
Wang, R. F., & Spelke, E. S. (2000) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00105-0 · Cited by 401
Viewpoint Dependence in Scene Recognition
Diwadkar, V. A., & McNamara, T. P. (1997) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00442.x · Cited by 312
Multiple views of spatial memory
Shelton, A. L., & Mcnamara, T. P. (1997) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03210780 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Tarr, M. J.
- Venue
- Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-82
- ISSN
- 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-5320
- OpenAlex
- W2137164733
- Cited by
- 461
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
