A traditional demonstration of the active properties of Pavlovian inhibition using differential CER
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The attention account fails to explain the active inhibition of fear found by Rescorla and LoLordo (1965), Rescorla (1966), and Hammond (1967).
“Although such an account is plausible for the present data, it fails to explain the active inhibition of fear found by Rescorla and LoLordo (1965), Rescorla (1966), and Hammond (1967).”
From Probability of shock in the presence and absence of cs in fear conditioning. (1968) · cites this paper as Hammond (1967)
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning.
Rescorla, R. A., & Solomon, R. L. (1967) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0024475 · Cited by 1,487 · see citing works
Inhibition of avoidance behavior.
Rescorla, R. A., & Lolordo, V. M. (1965) · Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0022060 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- HAMMOND, L. J. Increased responding to CS -in differential CER. Psychon. Sci., 1966, 5, 337-338.
- RESCORLA, R. A. Pavlovian conditioning and its proper control pro- cedures. PsychoL Rev., 1967,74,71-80.
- RESCORLA, R. A., & LoLORDO, V. M. Inhibition of avoidance be- havior. J. comp. physioL PsychoL, 1965, 59, 406412.
- RODNICK, E. H. Does the interval of delay of conditioned responses possess inhibitory properties? J. expo PsychoL, 1937, 20, 507-527.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: Sadder but wiser?
Alloy, L. B., & Abramson, L. Y. (1979) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.108.4.441 · Cited by 1,692 · see citing works
Probability of shock in the presence and absence of cs in fear conditioning.
Rescorla, R. A. (1968) · Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0025984 · Cited by 1,067 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hammond, L. J.
- Affiliations
- Temple University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hammond, Lynn J.
- Venue
- Psychonomic Science
- Published
- 1967-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 65-66
- ISSN
- 0033-3131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2042592150
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Psychonomic Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- extinction, conditioned stimulus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
