Cited by 44Memory Processes and InfluencesDeception detection and forensic psychologyJury Decision Making Processes

Determinants of eyewitness performance on a lineup

Open access
Buckhout, Robert, Alper, Andrea, Chern, Susan, Silverberg, Glenn, Slomovits, Miriam·1974·Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/bf03334241

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The eyewitness literature often only relies on self-reported stress.

    “The eyewitness literature often only relies on self-reported stress (e.g., Buckhout et al., 1974; Davis et al., 2019; Pezdek et al., 2020).”
  • The Buckhout et al. (1974) study was a rather realistic, live staged crime, rather than a filmed one.

    “Nevertheless, it should be noted that the study of Buckhout et al. (1974) was a rather realistic, liv e staged crime, rather than a fi lmed one.”

    From A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory (2004) · cites this paper as Buckhout et al. (1974)

  • One study (Buckhout et al., 1974) was responsible for most of the difference in effect sizes between staged-crime and other-means studies.

    “One study (Buckhout, Alper, Chern, Silverberg, & Slomovits, 1974) was re sponsible for most of this difference in effect sizes, however.”

    From A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory (2004) · cites this paper as Buckhout, Alper, Chern, Silverberg, & Slomovits, 1974

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buckhout, R., Alper, A., Chern, S., Silverberg, G., & Slomovits, M.
Affiliations
City University of New York (US)
Venue
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society
Published
1974-09
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
191-192
ISSN
0090-5054 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046509814
Cited by
44
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
  • Social Sciences › Law › Jury Decision Making Processes
Keywords
eyewitness identification, lineups, identification accuracy, commission errors, omission errors, misidentification, positive identification, suspect identification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review