Cited by 104Multisensory perception and integrationNeuroscience and Music PerceptionTactile and Sensory Interactions

Infants' perception of rhythm and tempo in unimodal and multimodal stimulation: A developmental test of the intersensory redundancy hypothesis

Open access
BAHRICK, L. E., LICKLITER, R.·2004·Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Research has demonstrated that young infants can detect a change in the tempo and the rhythm of an event when they experience the event bimodally (audiovisually), but not when they experience it unimodally (acoustically or visually). According to Bahrick and Lickliter (2000, 2002), intersensory redundancy available in bimodal, but not in unimodal, stimulation directs attention to the amodal properties of events in early development. Later in development, as infants become more experienced perceivers, attention becomes more flexible and can be directed toward amodal properties in unimodal and bimodal stimulation. The present study tested this developmental hypothesis by assessing the ability of older, more perceptually experienced infants to discriminate the tempo or rhythm of an event, using procedures identical to those in prior studies. The results indicated that older infants can detect a change in the rhythm and the tempo of an event following both bimodal (audiovisual) and unimodal (visual) stimulation. These results provide further support for the intersensory redundancy hypothesis and are consistent with a pattern of increasing specificity in perceptual development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/cabn.4.2.137

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some multisensory abilities are present from early infancy, but children do not integrate information across modalities to reduce sensory uncertainty until age ≥8 y.

    “Although some multisensory abilities are present from early infancy (6–8), in recent studies, children did not integrate information across modalities for shape discrimination, spatial localization, or detection of visual–auditory events until age ≥8 y (9–11).”

    From Fusion of visual cues is not mandatory in children (2010) · cites this paper as [7]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 104

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lickliter, R., Bahrick, L. E., & Markham, R. (2004, May). Intersen- sory redundancy can educate attention during prenatal development. Paper presented at the International Conference on Infant Studies, Chicago.

Authors
BAHRICK, L. E., & LICKLITER, R.
Affiliations
Florida International University (US)
Corresponding author
BAHRICK, L. E.
Venue
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2004-06-01
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
137-147
ISSN
  • 1530-7026 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-135X
OpenAlex
W2077185467
Cited by
104
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Florida International University Digital Commons (Florida International University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH62225, R01 MH62226, R01MH062225, R01MH062226)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
audiovisual integration, perceptual development, attentional flexibility
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Child, Child, Preschool, Discrimination Learning, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Humans, Infant, Male, Periodicity, Photic Stimulation, Psychological Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review