Cited by 337Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesFace Recognition and PerceptionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Functional connectivity during working memory maintenance

Open access
GAZZALEY, A., RISSMAN, J., D'ESPOSITO, M.·2004·Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Neurophysiological experiments with monkeys have demonstrated that working memory (WM) is associated with persistent neural activity in multiple brain regions, such as the prefrontal cortex (PFC), the parietal cortex, and posterior unimodal association areas. WM maintenance is believed to require the coordination of these brain regions, which do not function in isolation but, rather, interact to maintain visual percepts that are no longer present in the environment. However, single-unit physiology studies and traditional univariate analyses of functional brain imaging data cannot evaluate interactions between distant brain regions, and so evidence of regional integration during WM maintenance is largely indirect. In this study, we utilized a recently developed multivariate analysis method that allows us to explore functional connectivity between brain regions during the distinct stages of a delayed face recognition task. To characterize the neural network mediating the on-line maintenance of faces, the fusiform face area (FFA) was defined as a seed and was then used to generate whole-brain correlation maps. A random effects analysis of the correlation data revealed a network of brain regions exhibiting significant correlations with the FFA seed during the WM delay period. This maintenance network included the dorsolateral and ventrolateral PFC, the premotor cortex, the intraparietal sulcus, the caudate nucleus, the thalamus, the hippocampus, and occipitotemporal regions. These findings support the notion that the coordinated functional interaction between nodes of a widely distributed network underlies the active maintenance of a perceptual representation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/cabn.4.4.580

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 155 · Cited by 337

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Baddeley, A. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Goldman-Rakic, P. S., Chafee, M., & Friedman, H. (1993). Allocation of function in distributed circuits. In T. Ono, L. Squire, M. Raichle, D. Perret, & M. Fukuda (Eds.), Brain mechanisms of perception and memory: From neuron to behavior (Pt. 4, pp. 445-456). New York: Ox- ford University Press.
  3. Petrides, M. (1994). Frontal lobes and working memory: Evidence from investigations of the effects of cortical excisions in nonhuman primates. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsy- chology (Vol. 9, pp. 59-84). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  4. Simon, S. R., Meunier, M., Piettre, L., Berardi, A. M., Sege- barth, C. M., & Boussaoud, D. (2002). Spatial attention and mem- ory versus motor preparation: Premotor cortex involvement as re- vealed by f MRI. Journal of Neurophysiology, 88, 2047-2057.

Authors
GAZZALEY, A., RISSMAN, J., & D'ESPOSITO, M.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
GAZZALEY, A.
Venue
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2004-12-01
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
580-599
ISSN
  • 1530-7026 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-135X
OpenAlex
W2022077443
Cited by
337
References
155
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 16
FWCI
5.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
working memory maintenance, functional connectivity, fusiform face area, face recognition (cognition), delayed response task, prefrontal cortex, parietal cortex, intraparietal sulcus, hippocampus, caudate nucleus, thalamus, neural network integration, perceptual representation
MeSH terms
Brain, Hippocampus, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Memory, Nerve Net, Parietal Lobe, Thalamus, Visual Pathways, Visual Perception, Prefrontal Cortex, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review