Reward can modulate attentional capture, independent of top-down set
Open accessAbstract
The traditional distinction between exogenous and endogenous attentional control has recently been enriched with an additional mode of control, termed "selection history." Recent findings have indicated, for instance, that previously rewarded or punished stimuli capture more attention than their physical attributes would predict. As such, the value that is associated with certain stimuli modulates attentional capture. This particular influence has also been shown for endogenous attention. Although recent leads have emerged, elucidating the influences of reward on exogenous and endogenous attention, it remains unclear to what extent exogenous attention is modulated by reward when endogenous attention is already deployed. We used a Posner cueing task in which exogenous and endogenous cues were presented to guide attention. Crucially, the exogenous cue also indicated the reward value. That is, the color of the exogenous cue indicated how much reward could be obtained on a given trial. The results showed main effects of endogenous and exogenous attention (i.e., speeded reaction times when either cue was valid, as compared to when it was invalid). Crucially, an interaction between exogenous cue validity and reward level was observed, indicating that reward-based associative-learning processes rapidly influence attentional capture, even when endogenous attention has been actively deployed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent studies showed that the ceasing of capture by abrupt onset distractors when attention is focused is not the case for reward-signaling or previously reward-associated stimuli.
“recent studies showed that this is not the case for reward-signaling or previously reward-associated stimuli (e.g., MacLean, Diaz, & Giesbrecht, 2016; Munneke, Belopolsky, & Theeuwes, 2016; Munneke, Hoppenbrouwers, & Theeuwes, 2015; Wang et al., 2015).”
From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Munneke, Hoppenbrouwers, & Theeuwes, 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 51
- Authors
- Munneke, J., Hoppenbrouwers, S. S., & Theeuwes, J.
- Affiliations
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Munneke, Jaap
- Venue
- Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
- Published
- 2015-07-16
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2540-2548
- ISSN
- 1943-3921 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-393X
- PMC
- PMC4644218
- OpenAlex
- W863573265
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 4.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Attention Perception & Psychophysics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- attentional capture, reward, bottom-up attention, top-down attention, selection history, associative learning, Posner cueing task, reward value, cue validity, attentional control
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attention, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Reward, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review