Are forward and backward recall the same? A dual-task study of digit recall
Abstract
There is some debate surrounding the cognitive resources underlying backward digit recall. Some researchers consider it to differ from forward digit recall due to the involvement of executive control, while others suggest that backward recall involves visuospatial resources. Five experiments therefore investigated the role of executive-attentional and visuospatial resources in both forward and backward digit recall. In the first, participants completed visuospatial 0-back and 2-back tasks during the encoding of information to be remembered. The concurrent tasks did not differentially disrupt performance on backward digit recall, relative to forward digit recall. Experiment 2 shifted concurrent load to the recall phase instead and, in this case, revealed a larger effect of both tasks on backward recall, relative to forwards recall, suggesting that backward recall may draw on additional resources during the recall phase and that these resources are visuospatial in nature. Experiments 3 and 4 then further investigated the role of visual processes in forward and backward recall using dynamic visual noise (DVN). In Experiment 3, DVN was presented during encoding of information to be remembered and had no effect upon performance. However, in Experiment 4, it was presented during the recall phase, and the results provided evidence of a role for visual imagery in backward digit recall. These results were replicated in Experiment 5, in which the same list length was used for forward and backward recall tasks. The findings are discussed in terms of both theoretical and practical implications.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Our findings mirror a well-studied effect in humans, wherein recall is harder in the backward direction than in the forward direction.
“Indeed, our findings mirror a well-studied effect in humans, wherein recall is harder in the backward direction than in the forward direction (Clair-Thompson & Allen, 2013;Thomas et al., 2003;Bireta et al., 2010;Li & Lewandowsky, 1995;Guitard et al., 2019).”
From The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn "B is A" (2023) · cites this paper as Clair-Thompson & Allen, 2013
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 98
Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.
- Authors
- St Clair-Thompson, H. L., & Allen, R. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Leeds (GB)
- ORCID
- Allen, Richard J.
- Venue
- Memory & Cognition
- Published
- 2012-12-22
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 519-532
- ISSN
- 0090-502X (ISSN-L)
- 1532-5946
- OpenAlex
- W2086112280
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 1.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Memory & Cognition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- dual-task interference, visuospatial working memory, executive function, visual imagery, dynamic visual noise
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Attention, Humans, Mental Recall, Space Perception, Mathematical Concepts, Young Adult, Executive Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review