Cited by 64Memory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and MemoryCognitive Abilities and Testing

Intentional forgetting: Note-taking as a naturalistic example

Eskritt, Michelle, Ma, Sierra·2014·Memory & Cognition

Abstract

In the present study, we examined whether note-taking as a memory aid may provide a naturalistic example of intentional forgetting. In the first experiment, participants played Concentration, a memory card game in which the identity and location of pairs of cards need to be remembered. Before the game started, half of the participants were allowed to study the cards, and the other half made notes that were then unexpectedly taken away. No significant differences emerged between the two groups for remembering identity information, but the study group remembered significantly more location information than did the note-taking group. In a second experiment, we examined whether note-takers would show signs of proactive interference while playing Concentration repeatedly. The results indicated that they did not. The findings suggest that participants adopted an intentional-forgetting strategy when using notes to store certain types of information.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/s13421-013-0362-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In prior lines of research, participants typically could not choose how to perform the task while encoding task-relevant information.

    “Critically, in these lines of research, the participants typically could not choose how to perform the task while encoding task-relevant information (e.g., Eskritt & Ma, 2014; Kelly & Risko, 2019; Sparrow et al., 2011).”

    From Consequences of cognitive offloading: Boosting performance but diminishing memory (2021) · cites this paper as Eskritt & Ma, 2014

  • People tend to forget location-related information in a card game when using notes.

    “people tend to forget location-related information in a card game when using notes”

    From The Cognitive Architecture of Digital Externalization (2023) · cites this paper as Eskritt & Ma, 2014

  • Memory for other types of information remained unaffected by externalization.

    “while the memory for other types of information remained unaffected by externalization.”

    From The Cognitive Architecture of Digital Externalization (2023) · cites this paper as Eskritt & Ma, 2014

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 64

Authors
Eskritt, M., & Ma, S.
Affiliations
Mount Saint Vincent University (CA)
Corresponding author
Eskritt, Michelle
Venue
Memory & Cognition
Published
2013-09-07
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
237-246
ISSN
  • 0090-502X (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5946
OpenAlex
W2066162068
Cited by
64
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Memory & Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
intentional forgetting, note-taking, memory aids, proactive interference, spatial memory, memory strategies
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Intention, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review