Cited by 115Neuroscience and Music PerceptionDiverse Music Education InsightsCognitive Abilities and Testing

The genetics of music accomplishment: Evidence for gene–environment correlation and interaction

Hambrick, David Z., Tucker-Drob, Elliot M.·2015·Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

Abstract

Theories of skilled performance that emphasize training history, such as K. Anders Ericsson and colleagues' deliberate-practice theory, have received a great deal of recent attention in both the scientific literature and the popular press. Twin studies, however, have demonstrated evidence for moderate-to-strong genetic influences on skilled performance. Focusing on musical accomplishment in a sample of over 800 pairs of twins, we found evidence for gene-environment correlation, in the form of a genetic effect on music practice. However, only about one quarter of the genetic effect on music accomplishment was explained by this genetic effect on music practice, suggesting that genetically influenced factors other than practice contribute to individual differences in music accomplishment. We also found evidence for gene-environment interaction, such that genetic effects on music accomplishment were most pronounced among those engaging in music practice, suggesting that genetic potentials for skilled performance are most fully expressed and fostered by practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3758/s13423-014-0671-9

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hambrick, D. Z., & Tucker-Drob, E. M.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Corresponding author
Hambrick, David Z.
Venue
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
2014-06-24
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
112-120
ISSN
  • 1069-9384 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-5320
OpenAlex
W1966782821
Cited by
115
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychonomic Bulletin & Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD042849, R21HD069772)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Music › Diverse Music Education Insights
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
gene-environment correlation, gene-environment interaction, music practice, twin studies, deliberate practice
MeSH terms
Achievement, Adult, Aptitude, Female, Humans, Male, Music, Practice, Psychological, Statistics as Topic, Twins, Gene-Environment Interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review