Cited by 1Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesBotany and Plant Ecology StudiesBiological Control of Invasive Species

Influence of the light environment, cutting size, and existence of roots on the survival and regrowth of an invasive species, Epipremnum aureum

Open access
Hachisuka, Rico, Ishikawa, Kaho, Ugawa, Shin·2023·Tropics

Abstract

Understanding the regrowth condition and pattern for the vine plant Epipremnum aureum is important for effective removal of this invasive species. The purpose of this study was to clarify the influence of the light environment, size of the plant body, and existence of roots on the survival and regrowth of a piece of the plant body of E. aureum. We surveyed the survival and regrowth of E. aureum for plant cuttings of different sizes under three light conditions representing the outside, edge, and inside of forests (Experiment 1), and for plant cuttings of different sizes with or without roots inside forests (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, we observed a high mortality outside forests, but confirmed higher survival rate and probability of regrowth at forest edges and inside forests. Even one leaf with a stem and root could regrow under low light intensity, whereas the amount of regrown plant organs or tissue was higher for a larger cutting. In Experiment 2, the number of roots increased more rapidly for plant cuttings without initial roots than for those with initial roots, although the amount of regrown plant tissue increased with increasing cutting size. Even small pieces of the plant body of E. aureum with no roots frequently survived and regrew under low light intensity. This indicates that small pieces of the plant body should not be left at forest edges or inside forests during removal work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3759/tropics.ms23-1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 1

Authors
Hachisuka, R., Ishikawa, K., & Ugawa, S.
Affiliations
Kagoshima University (JP)
Venue
Tropics
Published
2023-12-01
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
35-48
ISSN
  • 0917-415X (ISSN-L)
  • 1882-5729
OpenAlex
W4386322856
Cited by
1
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
0.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Tropics (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Biological Control of Invasive Species
Keywords
Epipremnum aureum, invasive species, cuttings, cutting size, light environment, plant survival, regrowth, forest edge, forest interior, invasive species eradication, leafy cuttings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review