The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Photocatalytic antibacterial performance of TiO2 and Ag-doped TiO2 against S. aureus. P. aeruginosa and E. coli
Open accessAbstract
This paper reports the structural and optical properties and comparative photocatalytic activity of TiO 2 and Ag-doped TiO 2 nanoparticles against different bacterial strains under visible-light irradiation. The TiO 2 and Ag-doped TiO 2 photocatalysts were synthesized by acid catalyzed sol–gel technique and characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), UV–vis spectroscopy and photoluminescence (PL). The XRD pattern revealed that the annealed sample of TiO 2 has both anatase and rutile phases while only an anatase phase was found in Ag-doped TiO 2 nanoparticles. The decreased band-gap energy of Ag-doped TiO 2 nanoparticles in comparison to TiO 2 nanoparticles was investigated by UV–vis spectroscopy. The rate of recombination and transfer behaviour of the photoexcited electron–hole pairs in the semiconductors was recorded by photoluminescence. The antimicrobial activity of TiO 2 and Ag-doped TiO 2 nanoparticles (3% and 7%) was investigated against both gram positive (Staphylococcus aureus) and gram negative (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli) bacteria. As a result, the viability of all three microorganisms was reduced to zero at 60 mg/30 mL culture in the case of both (3% and 7% doping) concentrations of Ag-doped TiO 2 nanoparticles. Annealed TiO 2 showed zero viability at 80 mg/30 mL whereas doped Ag-TiO 2 7% showed zero viability at 40 mg/30 mL culture in the case of P. aeruginosa only.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Explaining the Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity of Degussa P25 Mixed-Phase TiO 2 Using EPR
Hurum, D. C., Agrios, A. G., Gray, K. A., Rajh, T., & Thurnauer, M. C. (2003) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp0273934 · Cited by 2,015
Cited by
Nanoparticles: Properties, applications and toxicities
Khan, I., Saeed, K., & Khan, I. (2019) · Arabian Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.arabjc.2017.05.011 · Cited by 6,244
Khezerlou, A., Alizadeh-Sani, M., Azizi-Lalabadi, M., & Ehsani, A. (2018) · Microbial Pathogenesis · doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2018.08.008 · Cited by 404
Gogoi, D., Namdeo, A., Golder, A. K., & Peela, N. R. (2020) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.11.127 · Cited by 298
Lu, J., Lu, H., Liang, D., Feng, S., Li, Y., & Li, J. (2023) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138824 · Cited by 65
Ranjitha, S., Aroulmoji, V., Selvankumar, T., Sudhakar, C., & Hariharan, V. (2020) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105733 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Gupta, K., Singh, R. P., Pandey, A., & Pandey, A.
- Venue
- Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology
- Publisher
- Beilstein Institut
- Published
- 2013-06-06
- Volume
- 4
- Pages
- 345-351
- ISSN
- 2190-4286 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162649392
- Cited by
- 341
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Photocatalytic antibacterial performance of TiO2 and Ag-doped TiO2 against S. aureus. P. aeruginosa and E. coli. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3762/bjnano.4.40
- The paper
- Gupta, K., Singh, R. P., Pandey, A., & Pandey, A. (2013). Photocatalytic antibacterial performance of TiO2 and Ag-doped TiO2 against S. aureus. P. aeruginosa and E. coli. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.4.40
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.