The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Green synthesis of fluorescent carbon dots from spices for in vitro imaging and tumour cell growth inhibition
Open accessAbstract
Carbon dots have demonstrated great potential as luminescent nanoparticles in bioapplications. Although such nanoparticles appear to exhibit low toxicity compared to other metal luminescent nanomaterials, today we know that the toxicity of carbon dots (C-dots) strongly depends on the protocol of fabrication. In this work, aqueous fluorescent C-dots have been synthesized from cinnamon, red chilli, turmeric and black pepper, by a one-pot green hydrothermal method. The synthesized C-dots were firstly characterized by means of UV–vis, fluorescence, Fourier transform infrared and Raman spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering and transmission electron microscopy. The optical performance showed an outstanding ability for imaging purposes, with quantum yields up to 43.6%. Thus, the cytotoxicity of the above mentioned spice-derived C-dots was evaluated in vitro in human glioblastoma cells (LN-229 cancer cell line) and in human kidney cells (HK-2 non-cancerous cell line). Bioimaging and viability studies were performed with different C-dot concentrations from 0.1 to 2 mg·mL−1, exhibiting a higher uptake of C-dots in the cancer cultures compared to the non-cancerous cells. Results showed that the spice-derived C-dots inhibited cell viability dose-dependently after a 24 h incubation period, displaying a higher toxicity in LN-229, than in HK-2 cells. As a control, C-dots synthesized from citric acid did not show any significant toxicity in either cancerous or non-cancerous cells, implying that the tumour cell growth inhibition properties observed in the spice-derived C-dots can be attributed to the starting material employed for their fabrication. These results evidence that functional groups in the surface of the C-dots might be responsible for the selective cytotoxicity, as suggested by the presence of piperine in the surface of black pepper C-dots analysed by ESI-QTOF-MS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Carbon quantum dots and their biomedical and therapeutic applications: a review
Molaei, M. J. (2019) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c8ra08088g · Cited by 538
Greener synthesis of chemical compounds and materials
Kharissova, O. V., Kharisov, B. I., Oliva González, C. M., Méndez, Y. P., & López, I. (2019) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.191378 · Cited by 474
Future Perspectives and Review on Organic Carbon Dots in Electronic Applications
Semeniuk, M., Yi, Z., Poursorkhabi, V., Tjong, J., Jaffer, S., Lu, Z.-H., & Sain, M. (2019) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.9b00688 · Cited by 367
Metadata
- Authors
- Vasimalai, N., Vilas-Boas, V., Gallo, J., Cerqueira, M. D. F., Menéndez-Miranda, M., Costa-Fernández, J. M., Diéguez, L., Espiña, B., & Fernández-Argüelles, M. T.
- Venue
- Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology
- Publisher
- Beilstein Institut
- Published
- 2018-02-13
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 530-544
- ISSN
- 2190-4286 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2786192136
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Green synthesis of fluorescent carbon dots from spices for in vitro imaging and tumour cell growth inhibition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3762/bjnano.9.51
- The paper
- Vasimalai, N., Vilas-Boas, V., Gallo, J., Cerqueira, M. D. F., Menéndez-Miranda, M., Costa-Fernández, J. M., Diéguez, L., Espiña, B., & Fernández-Argüelles, M. T. (2018). Green synthesis of fluorescent carbon dots from spices for in vitro imaging and tumour cell growth inhibition. Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.9.51
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.