The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Heading for higher ground: factors affecting real and hypothetical hurricane evacuation behavior
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to assess the determinants of hurricane evacuation behavior of North Carolina coastal households during Hurricane Bonnie and a future hypothetical hurricane. We use the data from a telephone survey of North Carolina coastal residents. Hypothetical questions are used to assess whether respondents will evacuate and where in the case of a future hurricane with varying intensities. We examine the social, economic, and risk factors that affect the decisions to evacuate and whether to go to a shelter or motel/hotel relative to other destinations. The most important predictor of evacuation is storm intensity. Households are more likely to evacuate when given evacuation orders, when they perceive a flood risk, and when they live in mobile homes. Households who own pets are less likely to evacuate. Non-white households, pet owners and those with more education are less likely to go to either a motel/hotel or shelter, preferring instead to stay with friends or family.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Human System Responses to Disaster
Drabek, T. E. (1986) · Springer Series on Environmental Management · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4960-3 · Cited by 791
Baker, E. J. (1991) · International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters · doi:10.1177/028072709100900210 · Cited by 669
Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Gender and the Sociology of Disasters
Forrest, T. R., Peacock, W. G., Morrow, B. H., & Gladwin, H. (1999) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2654178 · Cited by 603
Crying wolf: Repeat responses to hurricane evacuation orders
Dow, K., & Cutter, S. L. (1998) · Coastal Management · doi:10.1080/08920759809362356 · Cited by 401
Families in Disaster: Reactions and Relatives
Drabek, T. E., & Boggs, K. S. (1968) · Journal of Marriage and the Family · doi:10.2307/349914 · Cited by 235
Disaster Responses within the Tourist Industry
Drabek, T. E. (1995) · International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters · doi:10.1177/028072709501300102 · Cited by 116
Minority Citizens in Disasters.
Barton, A. H., Perry, R. W., & Mushkatel, A. H. (1988) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2073927 · Cited by 112
Coastal Waters of the World: Trends, Threats, and Strategies
DNN, & Hinrichsen, D. (1997) · Colonial Waterbirds · doi:10.2307/1521623 · Cited by 73
Cited by
Evacuation from Natural Disasters: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Thompson, R. R., Garfin, D. R., & Silver, R. C. (2017) · Risk Analysis · doi:10.1111/risa.12654 · Cited by 331
Weathering the Storm: The Impact of Hurricanes on Physical and Mental Health
Bourque, L. B., Siegel, J. M., Kano, M., & Wood, M. M. (2006) · The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716205284920 · Cited by 178
Metadata
- Authors
- Whitehead, J. C., Edwards, B., Van Willigen, M., Maiolo, J. R., Wilson, K., & Smith, K. T.
- Venue
- Environmental Hazards
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 133-142
- ISSN
- 1464-2867 (ISSN-L)
- 1747-7891
- 1878-0059
- OpenAlex
- W3125092498
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 9.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heading for higher ground: factors affecting real and hypothetical hurricane evacuation behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3763/ehaz.2000.0219
- The paper
- Whitehead, J. C., Edwards, B., Van Willigen, M., Maiolo, J. R., Wilson, K., & Smith, K. T. (2001). Heading for higher ground: factors affecting real and hypothetical hurricane evacuation behavior. Environmental Hazards. https://doi.org/10.3763/ehaz.2000.0219
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.