The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improving Hearing Performance for Cochlear Implant Recipients with Use of a Digital, Wireless, Remote-Microphone, Audio-Streaming Accessory
Abstract
Background:Cochlear implant (CI) recipients experience difficulty understanding speech in noise. Remote-microphone technology that improves the signal-to-noise ratio is recognized as an effective means to improve speech recognition in noise; however, there are no published studies evaluating the potential benefits of a wireless, remote-microphone, digital, audio-streaming accessory device (heretofore referred to as a remote-microphone accessory) designed to deliver audio signals directly to a CI sound processor.Purpose:The objective of this study was to compare speech recognition in quiet and in noise of recipients while using their CI alone and with a remote-microphone accessory.Research Design:A two-way repeated measures design was used to evaluate performance differences obtained in quiet and in increasing levels of competing noise with the CI sound processor alone and with the sound processor paired to the remote microphone accessory.Study Sample:Sixteen users of Cochlear Nucleus 24 Freedom, CI512, and CI422 implants were included in the study.Data Collection and Analysis:Participants were evaluated in 14 conditions including use of the sound processor alone and with the remote-microphone accessory in quiet and at the following signal levels: 65 dBA speech (at the location of the participant; 85 dBA at the location of the remote microphone) in quiet and competing noise at 50, 55, 60, 65, 70, and 75 dBA noise levels. Speech recognition was evaluated in each of these conditions with one full list of AzBio sentences.Results:Speech recognition in quiet and in all competing noise levels, except the 75 dBA condition, was significantly better with use of the remote-microphone accessory compared with participants’ performance with the CI sound processor alone. As expected, in all technology conditions, performance was significantly poorer as the competing noise level increased.Conclusions:Use of a remote-microphone accessory designed for a CI sound processor provides superior speech recognition in quiet and in noise when compared with performance obtained with the CI sound processor alone.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The wearable device was used to measure the temperature changes on human arm over time; nevertheless, the drug delivery capability was not tested and the transistors were not integrated within the device, showing limited translation to potential”
From Wearables in Medicine (2018) · cites this paper as [168]
In the citing paper
“Recently, a wearable microfluidic bandage incorporating sensors and a drug delivery system was developed (Figure 7b).168”
From Wearables in Medicine (2018) · cites this paper as [168]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yetisen, A. K., Martinez‐Hurtado, J. L., Ünal, B., Khademhosseini, A., & Butt, H. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201706910 · Cited by 569
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolfe, J., Morais, M., & Schafer, E.
- Affiliations
- University of North Texas (US)
- Venue
- Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
- Publisher
- American Academy of Audiology
- Published
- 2015-06-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 532-539
- ISSN
- 1050-0545 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2418423427
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 1.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
- Keywords
- cochlear implants, remote microphones, speech recognition in noise, speech recognition in quiet, signal-to-noise ratio, hearing aid accessories
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Auditory Threshold, Cochlear Implants, Deafness, Equipment Design, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Noise, Speech Perception, Cochlear Implantation, Young Adult, Signal-To-Noise Ratio
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
