Cited by 4Immune responses and vaccinationsAquaculture disease management and microbiotaImmune Response and Inflammation

Beta-glucan induced trained immunity is associated with changes in gut Nccrp-1+ and Mpeg-1+cell populations in rag1-/- zebrafish

Open access
Peterman, Beth, Petrie-Hanson, Lora·2021·Journal of Aquaculture, Marine Biology & Ecology

Abstract

This study determined the effects of beta-glucan and Resiquimod (R848) on the non-specific cytotoxic cell (NCC), Natural Killer cell (NK) and macrophage/monocyte cell populations in the gut of rag1 -/-zebrafish.This study also determined if these changes were long-term and if changes in cell populations were associated with increased survival.Innate immune cells in rag1 -/-zebrafish include a decreased lymphocyte-like cell population with NCC's and NK cells, a macrophage/monocyte population, and neutrophils.Rag1 -/- zebrafish were exposed to phosphate buffered saline (PBS), beta-glucan or R848 by intracoelomic injection and after four weeks, gut samples were collected to analyze cell type distribution and protein expression of Nccrp-1 (NCC cells), Mpeg-1 (macrophages/monocytes) and Nitr9 (NK cells) by flow cytometry and western blot analyses.A separate group of rag1 -/-zebrafish was gavage challenged with Edwardsiella ictaluri at 4 weeks post PBS, beta-glucan or R848 injection and survival and cell type distribution were analyzed.There were significantly more NCCs and macrophages in rag1 -/-zebrafish gut tissue 4 weeks post beta-glucan injection when compared to PBS injected control tissues.There were significant differences in the relative protein expression of Mpeg-1 and Nitr9 after stimulation with beta-glucan or R848.Following gavage bacterial challenge, rag1 -/-zebrafish previously exposed to beta-glucan had significantly higher survival than rag1 -/- zebrafish previously exposed to PBS and significantly more NCCs and macrophages in the gut.These findings demonstrate that resident gut NCCs and macrophages in rag1 -/-zebrafish increase in number and undergo immune-modulation or training and contribute to increased survival after exposure to an enteric pathogen four weeks post immune-modulation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.37722/jambe.2021101

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Long-term protection one month after oral bacterial exposure was demonstrated using the rag1−/− model.

    “Further use of the rag1−/− model demonstrated long-term protection one month after oral bacterial exposure [3].”

    From Trained Immunity Provides Long-Term Protection against Bacterial Infections in Channel Catfish (2022) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Survival section says rag1−/− zebrafish were orally challenged with bacteria one month after beta-glucan or control treatment, then monitored for deaths for 15 days. The Discussion reports significantly higher survival in beta-glucan-treated fish. Thus the paper supports protection against an oral bacterial challenge, but not protection demonstrated one month after bacterial exposure; the one-month interval preceded the challenge. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Teleost innate immune cells were shown to mediate protective immunity in T and B cell deficient rag1−/− zebrafish.

    “Further, teleost innate immune cells were shown to mediate protective immunity in the T and B cell deficient rag1−/− zebrafish [2,3].”

    From Trained Immunity Provides Long-Term Protection against Bacterial Infections in Channel Catfish (2022) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Survival results (page unavailable) show that beta-glucan-treated rag1−/− zebrafish survived bacterial challenge significantly more often than controls. The Discussion (page unavailable) associates that protection with increased innate immune cell populations, but does not establish that those cells mediated the protection; that causal wording overstates the finding. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Beta glucan induced trained immunity associated with macrophage populations in rag1−/− zebrafish.

    “Beta glucan induced trained immunity associated with macrophage populations in rag1−/− zebrafish [3].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Xu J, Du L, Wen Z (2012) Myelopoiesis during Zebrafish Early Development. Journal of Genetics and Genomics 39: 435-442.
  2. Caipang CMA (2013) Expression of genes involved in the early immune response at the distal segment of the gut in Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua L. after vaccination with a bacterial antigen 591-603. · DOI
  3. Gronke K, Kofoed-Nielsen M, Diefenback A (2016) Innate lymphoid cells, precursors and plasticity. Immunology Letters 179: 9-18.
  4. Meena DK, Das P, Kumar S, Mandal SC, Prusty AK, et al. (2013) Beta-glucan: An ideal immunostimulant in aquaculture (a review). Fish Physiology and Biochemistry 39: 431-457.
  5. Chan GCF, Chan WK, Sze DMY (2009) The effects of beta-glucan on human immune and cancer cells. In Journal of hematology & oncology 2: 25.
  6. Netea MG, van der Graaf C, Van der Meer JW, Kullberg BJ (2004) Toll-like receptors and the host defense against microbial pathogens: bringing specificity to the innate- immune system. Journal of leukocyte biology. 2004 75: 749-755.
  7. Sattler S, Ghadially H, Erhard E (2012) Evolution of the C- Type lectin-like receptor genes of the Dectin-1 cluster in the NK gene complex. Scientific World Journal .
  8. Hart OM, Athie-Morales V, O'Connor GM, Gardiner CM (2005) TLR7/8-Mediated Activation of Human NK Cells Results in Accessory Cell-Dependent IFN-γ Production. The Journal of Immunology 175: 1636-1642.
  9. Collymore C, Rasmussen S, Tolwani RJ (2013) Gavaging adult zebrafish. Journal of Visualized Experiments.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peterman, B., & Petrie-Hanson, L.
Affiliations
Mississippi State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Aquaculture, Marine Biology & Ecology
Published
2021
Volume
2021
Issue
01
ISSN
2692-1529 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3197526706
Cited by
4
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Aquaculture Marine Biology & Ecology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
Keywords
trained immunity, β-glucan, resiquimod, natural killer cells, macrophages, monocytes, MPEG-1, Edwardsiella ictaluri, survival, immunomodulation, innate immunity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review