Medicare Diabetes Prevention Program: where are the suppliers?
Abstract
Objectives The Medicare Diabetes Prevention Program (MDPP) launched in April 2018, offering an unprecedented opportunity to reach the estimated 48.3% of older adults with prediabetes. Success of the innovative policy is likely to depend on adequate supplier availability. We examined supplier data from CMS to assess beneficiaries' potential access to MDPP services. Study design We conducted a descriptive analysis of MDPP suppliers using data extracted from the CMS registry of suppliers as of July 2019 and data about beneficiary populations. Methods Identifying the location, type, and number of MDPP suppliers and their respective sites, including within states, US territories, and the District of Columbia (hereafter, states), we mapped geographic coverage of MDPP access. Results There are 126 unique supplier organizations that offer the MDPP across 601 sites, equating to only 1 site per 100,000 Medicare beneficiaries. Seventy-five percent of states have no MDPP sites, fewer than 1 site per 100,000 beneficiaries, and/or availability limited to a single municipality. Although only 10.3% of MDPP suppliers are community-based organizations, they represent more than half (55.7%) of sites where beneficiaries can access the program. Conclusions Findings show inadequate MDPP access, with relatively few suppliers and locations where beneficiaries can receive services. Insufficient reimbursement relative to costs for suppliers may largely account for limited availability. Strategies to f…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
75% of US states/territories had no MDPP sites, <1 site per 100,000 beneficiaries, and/or availability limited to a single municipality.
“Specifically, 75% of US states/territories had no MDPP sites, <1 site per 100,000 beneficiaries, and/or availability limited to a single municipality.”
From <p>Current Perspectives on the Impact of the National Diabetes Prevention Program: Building on Successes and Overcoming Challenges</p> (2020) · cites this paper as [74]
Severe shortages of MDPP sites were observed in states/territories with the largest populations of racial/ethnic minority beneficiaries.
“In fact, severe shortages of MDPP sites were observed in states/territories with largest populations of racial/ethnic minority beneficiaries,74”
From <p>Current Perspectives on the Impact of the National Diabetes Prevention Program: Building on Successes and Overcoming Challenges</p> (2020) · cites this paper as [74]
One year after Medicare coverage began, there was on average only 1 MDPP site per 100,000 beneficiaries.
“Regarding Medicare suppliers, a report found relatively few locations where beneficiaries could receive services over a year after coverage began, with only 1 site per 100,000 beneficiaries on average.74”
From <p>Current Perspectives on the Impact of the National Diabetes Prevention Program: Building on Successes and Overcoming Challenges</p> (2020) · cites this paper as [74]
The current DPP infrastructure is underutilized.
“Thus, the current DPP infrastructure is underutilized, and more methods that increase access and engagement are needed.”
From Effects of a Digital Diabetes Prevention Program: An RCT (2022) · cites this paper as [5]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 24
- Authors
- Ritchie, N. D., Sauder, K. A., & Gritz, R. M.
- Affiliations
- Denver Health Medical Center (US)
- Venue
- The American Journal of Managed Care
- Published
- 2020-06-12
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e198-e201
- ISSN
- 1088-0224 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-2692
- OpenAlex
- W3036907154
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 4.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Managed Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
- Keywords
- prediabetes, older adults, health care access, geographic coverage, community organizations, reimbursement, Medicare beneficiaries, diabetes prevention
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Drug Industry, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prediabetic State, Preventive Health Services, United States, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review