Growth in health information exchange with ACO market penetration
Abstract
Objectives First, to assess whether hospitals expand the network breadth of their health information exchange (HIE) partners after joining an accountable care organization (ACO). Second, to analyze whether this HIE network expansion effect varies across markets with differing levels of ACO penetration. Study design Difference-in-differences analyses of US nonfederal acute care hospitals, 2014-2017. Methods We used data from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey and Information Technology Supplement to measure hospital ACO participation, HIE network breadth (defined as number of different partner types), and ACO market penetration at the hospital referral region level. We implemented a difference-in-differences model to estimate changes in hospitals' HIE network breadth with ACO participation in different years. We estimate these effects combined across all markets and stratified by markets with high and low ACO market penetration. Results In combined analyses, HIE breadth increased by 0.35 partner types with ACO participation, a 30.7% increase (P Conclusions Hospitals that joined ACOs increased their HIE breadth, but this effect was heterogenous across markets and across time. Our findings illustrate a "network effect," with large, immediate effects in HIE breadth following ACO participation in high-ACO penetration markets and smaller, delayed effects in low-ACO penetration markets.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Participation in ACOs expands HIE breadth due to electronic data sharing with more partner types.
“Participation in ACOs has also been found to expand HIE breadth due to electronic data sharing with more partner types [55].”
From Evolution of clinical Health Information Exchanges to population health resources: a case study of the Indiana network for patient care (2025) · cites this paper as [55]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Williams, K. S., Rahurkar, S., Grannis, S. J., Schleyer, T. K., & Dixon, B. E. (2025) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-025-02933-9 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Apathy, N. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nate C. Apathy
- ORCID
- Nate C. Apathy
- Venue
- The American Journal of Managed Care
- Published
- 2022-01-17
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e7-e13
- ISSN
- 1088-0224 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-2692
- OpenAlex
- W4205208100
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Journal of Managed Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (T32 HS026116)
- National Institute on Aging (K24AG047908)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
- Keywords
- health information exchange, accountable care organizations, hospital referral regions, network effects, acute care hospitals, health care delivery reform
- MeSH terms
- Hospitals, Humans, United States, Accountable Care Organizations, Health Information Exchange
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review