Cited by 1Pharmacology and Obesity TreatmentObesity and Health PracticesObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

An efficient approach to expand equitable access to antiobesity medications: deprescribing after weight loss plateau

Open access
David D. Kim, A. Mark Fendrick·2024·The American Journal of Managed Care

Abstract

The authors advocate for a consideration of 2 distinct phases of obesity management (ie, active weight loss and maintenance of weight loss) to allow substantially more people access to antiobesity medications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.37765/ajmc.2024.89586

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This approach (duration limits) has been suggested by academics in the US and has been implemented by the NHS in England.

    “this approach has been suggested by academics in the US and has been implemented by the NHS in England [63,72].”

    From Affordable access to GLP-1 obesity medications: strategies to guide market action and policy solutions in the US (2025) · cites this paper as [72]

    In the main text (page unavailable), the US-based authors propose moving patients from full-dose antiobesity medication to a lower-cost maintenance program after a weight-loss plateau. That partly supports the claim that US academics suggested limiting treatment duration, but their proposal is tied to a clinical plateau rather than a fixed duration limit. The paper does not say that the NHS implemented duration limits in England. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 1 · Cited by 1

Authors
Kim, D. D., & Fendrick, A. M.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Managed Care
Published
2024-07-29
Volume
30
Issue
8
Pages
348-350
ISSN
  • 1088-0224 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-2692
OpenAlex
W4401597015
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
0.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Managed Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • American Heart Association
  • Yale University
  • National Pharmaceutical Council
  • Arnold Ventures
  • Yale New Haven Hospital
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK092949)
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
anti-obesity drugs, deprescribing, weight loss plateau, obesity treatment, weight loss maintenance
MeSH terms
Deprescriptions, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Obesity, United States, Weight Loss, Anti-Obesity Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review