Cited by 7Historical Turkish StudiesTurkish Literature and CultureIslamic Studies and History

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Yeni Osmanlılar

Open access
Koray, Enver·1983·Belleten

Abstract

"Yeni Osmanlılar" deyimi Ziya Paşa, Namık Kemal ve Ali Suavi gibi Tanzimat ve Birinci Meşrutiyet devrinde, özellikle 1865-1876 yılları arasında yazar ve fikir adamı olarak sivrilen şahısların meydana getirdiği topluluk için kullanılmıştır.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.37879/belleten.1983.563

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Koray, E.
Corresponding author
Koray, Enver
Venue
Belleten
Published
1983-04-01
Volume
47
Issue
186
Pages
563-582
ISSN
0041-4255 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4297060878
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
tr
Open access
Locations
Belleten (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Historical Turkish Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Turkish Literature and Culture
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Islamic Studies and History
Keywords
Ziya Paşa, Namık Kemal, Tanzimat, Ottoman intellectuals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review