The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SAĞLIK EĞİTİMİ ALAN ÖĞRENCİLERİN COVİD-19 SALGININA YÖNELİK ALGILARININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ
Open accessAbstract
Bu çalışma, sağlık eğitimi alan öğrencilerin Covid-19 ile ilgili bilgi, tutum ve davranışlarını belirlemek ve literatüre katkı sağlamak amacıyla yapılmıştır. Çalışmanın ilk aşamasında oluşturulan 47 maddelik madde havuzundan uzman görüşü doğrultusunda 10 madde çıkarılmıştır. Öğrencilere 37 maddeden oluşan taslak ölçek uygulanmış ve elde edilen veriler analiz edilmiştir. İlk aşamada açımlayıcı faktör analizi uygulanmıştır. KMO değeri 0,807, Barlett testi skoru 3517,143 (p<0,000) olarak hesaplanmış ve verilerin analize uygun olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. 36 maddelik taslak ölçekten faktör analiz neticesinde 5 faktörden oluşan 20 maddelik ölçek geliştirilmiştir. Ölçeğe ait açıklanan toplam varyans %63,008, maddelerin faktör yük değerleri 0,501 ile 0,875 arasında hesaplanmıştır. Belirlenen bu faktör yapısının uyumluluğu doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile teyit edilmiştir. Uyum indeksleri; χ2/df=3,156, GFI=0,947, IFI=0,922, TLI=0,904, CFI=0,922, RMSEA=0,049, NFI=0,900 olarak hesaplanmış ve modelin verilerle uyumlu olduğu sonucuna varılmıştır. Ölçeğin güvenirliğine ilişkin Cronbach Alpha değeri 0,848, aynı şekilde Cronbach Alpha değeri Faktör 1 için 0,886, Faktör 2 için 0,760, Faktör 3 için 0,827, Faktör 4 için 0,688, Faktör 5 için 0,673 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Çalışmanın neticesinde, geliştirilen Sağlık Eğitimi Alan Öğrencilerin Covid-19 Salgınına Yönelik tutum ölçeğinin geçerli ve güvenilir olduğu kanaatine varılmıştır.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The Cronbach's alpha value for the reliability of the scale was found to be 0.84. The Cronbach's alpha value calculated for the factors was 0.886 for factor 1, 0.760 for factor 2, 0.827 for factor 3, 0.688 for factor 4 and 0.673 for factor 5, indicating that the scale was valid and reliable (Arslan & Filiz 2020).”
From DETERMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HEALTH TECHNICIAN STUDENTS' ATTITUDES TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND INTOLERANCE OF UNCERTAINTY WITH DEPRESSION, ANXIETY, AND STRESS LEVELS (2023) · cites this paper as Arslan & Filiz 2020
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The Cronbach's alpha value for the reliability of the scale was found to be 0.84. The Cronbach's alpha value calculated for the factors was 0.886 for factor 1, 0.760 for factor 2, 0.827 for factor 3, 0.688 for factor 4 and 0.673 for factor 5, indicating that the scale was valid and reliable (Arslan & Filiz 2020).”
From DETERMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HEALTH TECHNICIAN STUDENTS' ATTITUDES TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND INTOLERANCE OF UNCERTAINTY WITH DEPRESSION, ANXIETY, AND STRESS LEVELS (2023) · cites this paper as Arslan & Filiz 2020
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The Cronbach's alpha value for the reliability of the scale was found to be 0.84. The Cronbach's alpha value calculated for the factors was 0.886 for factor 1, 0.760 for factor 2, 0.827 for factor 3, 0.688 for factor 4 and 0.673 for factor 5, indicating that the scale was valid and reliable (Arslan & Filiz 2020).”
From DETERMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HEALTH TECHNICIAN STUDENTS' ATTITUDES TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND INTOLERANCE OF UNCERTAINTY WITH DEPRESSION, ANXIETY, AND STRESS LEVELS (2023) · cites this paper as Arslan & Filiz 2020
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The Cronbach's alpha value for the reliability of the scale was found to be 0.84. The Cronbach's alpha value calculated for the factors was 0.886 for factor 1, 0.760 for factor 2, 0.827 for factor 3, 0.688 for factor 4 and 0.673 for factor 5, indicating that the scale was valid and reliable (Arslan & Filiz 2020).”
From DETERMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HEALTH TECHNICIAN STUDENTS' ATTITUDES TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND INTOLERANCE OF UNCERTAINTY WITH DEPRESSION, ANXIETY, AND STRESS LEVELS (2023) · cites this paper as Arslan & Filiz 2020
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The Cronbach's alpha value for the reliability of the scale was found to be 0.84. The Cronbach's alpha value calculated for the factors was 0.886 for factor 1, 0.760 for factor 2, 0.827 for factor 3, 0.688 for factor 4 and 0.673 for factor 5, indicating that the scale was valid and reliable (Arslan & Filiz 2020).”
From DETERMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HEALTH TECHNICIAN STUDENTS' ATTITUDES TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND INTOLERANCE OF UNCERTAINTY WITH DEPRESSION, ANXIETY, AND STRESS LEVELS (2023) · cites this paper as Arslan & Filiz 2020
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The Cronbach's alpha value for the reliability of the scale was found to be 0.84. The Cronbach's alpha value calculated for the factors was 0.886 for factor 1, 0.760 for factor 2, 0.827 for factor 3, 0.688 for factor 4 and 0.673 for factor 5, indicating that the scale was valid and reliable (Arslan & Filiz 2020).”
From DETERMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HEALTH TECHNICIAN STUDENTS' ATTITUDES TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND INTOLERANCE OF UNCERTAINTY WITH DEPRESSION, ANXIETY, AND STRESS LEVELS (2023) · cites this paper as Arslan & Filiz 2020
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007), Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi El Kitabı, Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık
Bütüner, S. Ö. (2008) · DergiPark (Istanbul University) · doi:10.17051/io.38688 · Cited by 802
SPSS ve AMOS Uygulamalı Örneklerle Güvenirlik ve Geçerlik Analizleri
Kartal, M., & Bardakçı, S. (2022) · Akademisyen Kitabevi eBooks · doi:10.37609/akya.1623 · Cited by 96
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- COCHRAN, William G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (Third ed.).
- KARA, A (2010) Domuz Gribi (Pandemik İnfluenza 2009, İnfluenza 2009 H1N1). Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Dergisi 53 (1): 42-58.
- KİSH, L. (1995), Survey Sampling, New York, Wiley.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Özçoban, F. A., Uluşen, M., Dilcen, H. Y., & Çilesiz, E. (2021) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/21645515.2021.2003648 · Cited by 7
Students’ “COVID-19” and “school” perceptions in the pandemic
Vural, Ö. F., Başaran, M., Demirtaş, Z., Karamanlı, A. R., & Bayrakcı, C. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.897177 · Cited by 5
Arslan, R., & FİLİZ, M. (2021) · Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi · doi:10.22466/acusbd.884242 · Cited by 4
Self-citationCOVID-19 SALGININA YÖNELİK TUTUMDA SAĞLIK OKURYAZARLIĞININ ETKİSİ
Kaya, S., & Şantaş, G. (2024) · Hacettepe sağlık idaresi dergisi · doi:10.61859/hacettepesid.1366205 · Cited by 3
Hemşirelik Öğrencilerinin COVID-19 Aşısı Yaptırmama Nedenlerinin Belirlenmesi: Nitel Bir Çalışma
Dengiz, K. S., & Hisar, F. (2023) · Etkili Hemşirelik Dergisi · doi:10.46483/deuhfed.976519 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- ARSLAN, R., & FİLİZ, M.
- Affiliations
- Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi (TR)
- Artvin Coruh University (TR)
- Venue
- Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi
- Publisher
- Cumhuriyet University
- Published
- 2020-09-22
- ISSN
- 1303-1279 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3090006358
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 2.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- tr
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DergiPark (Istanbul University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › COVID-19 Prevention and Impact
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, health education students, perceptions of COVID-19, knowledge, attitudes and behavior, scale development, COVID-19 knowledge, attitudes toward COVID-19, scale validation, factor structure, reliability and validity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
