The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Organotypic Cerebellar Cultures: Apoptotic Challenges and Detection
Open accessAbstract
Organotypic cultures of neuronal tissue were first introduced by Hogue in 1947 (1,2) and have constituted a major breakthrough in the field of neuroscience. Since then, the technique was developed further and currently there are many different ways to prepare organotypic cultures. The method presented here was adapted from the one described by Stoppini et al. for the preparation of the slices and from Gogolla et al. for the staining procedure (3,4). A unique feature of this technique is that it allows you to study different parts of the brain such as hippocampus or cerebellum in their original structure, providing a big advantage over dissociated cultures in which all the cellular organization and neuronal networks are disrupted. In the case of the cerebellum it is even more advantageous because it allows the study of Purkinje cells, extremely difficult to obtain as dissociated primary culture. This method can be used to study certain developmental features of the cerebellum in vitro, as well as for electrophysiological and pharmacological experiments in both wild type and mutant mice. The method described here was designed to study the effect of apoptotic stimuli such as Fas ligand in the developing cerebellum, using TUNEL staining to measure apoptotic cell death. If TUNEL staining is combined with cell type specific markers, such as Calbindin for Purkinje cells, it is possible to evaluate cell death in a cell population specific manner. The Calbindin staining also serves the purpose of evaluating the quality of the cerebellar cultures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Organotypic culture allows the study of the brain in its original structure.
“This technique allows the study of the brain in its original structure [19, 20].”
From Pharmacological ablation of astrocytes reduces Aβ degradation and synaptic connectivity in an ex vivo model of Alzheimer’s disease (2021) · cites this paper as [19]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Hogue, M.J., Human fetal ependymal cells in tissue cultures. Anat Rec 99 (4), 523-529 (1947). · DOI
- Hogue, M.J., Review of studies of human fetal brain cells in tissue cultures. Etudes Neonatales 1 (2), 1-13 (1952).
- Gogolla, N., Galimberti, I., DePaola, V., & Caroni, P., Staining protocol for organotypic hippocampal slice cultures. Nat Protoc 1 (5), 2452-2456 (2006). · DOI
- Stoppini, L., Buchs, P.A., & Muller, D., A simple method for organotypic cultures of nervous tissue. J Neurosci Methods 37 (2), 173-182 (1991). · DOI
- Beat H. Gähwiler, S.M.T., R. Anne McKinney, Dominique Debanne, and Richard T. Robertson, Organotypic Slice Cultures of Neural Tissue in Culturing Nerve Cells, edited by Gary Banker and Kimberly Goslin (The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1998), pp. 461-498.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Davis, N., Mota, B. C., Stead, L., Palmer, E. O. C., Lombardero, L., Rodríguez-Puertas, R., de Paola, V., Barnes, S. J., & Sastre, M. (2021) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-021-02117-y · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Hurtado de Mendoza, T., Balana, B., Slesinger, P. A., & Verma, I. M.
- Affiliations
- Salk Institute for Biological Studies (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Visualized Experiments
- Publisher
- MyJove Corporation
- Published
- 2011-05-17
- Issue
- 51
- ISSN
- 1940-087X (ISSN-L)
- DOI
- 10.3791/2564
- PMC
- PMC3197101
- OpenAlex
- W1966726072
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Journal of Visualized Experiments (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ellison Medical Foundation
- Prostate Cancer Foundation
- Sanofi
- McKnight Foundation
- Fondation Leducq
- Ipsen
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA019022)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- cerebellar development, Purkinje cells, apoptosis, Fas ligand, TUNEL staining, calbindin, neuronal cell death, cell type-specific markers
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cerebellum, Organ Culture Techniques, Apoptosis, In Situ Nick-End Labeling, Mice, Fas Ligand Protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review