Cited by 9DNA and Nucleic Acid ChemistryMolecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Rapid Colorimetric Assays to Qualitatively Distinguish RNA and DNA in Biomolecular Samples

Patterson, Jennifer, Mura, Cameron·2013·Journal of Visualized Experiments

Abstract

Biochemical experimentation generally requires accurate knowledge, at an early stage, of the nucleic acid, protein, and other biomolecular components in potentially heterogeneous specimens. Nucleic acids can be detected via several established approaches, including analytical methods that are spectrophotometric (e.g., A260), fluorometric (e.g., binding of fluorescent dyes), or colorimetric (nucleoside-specific chromogenic chemical reactions).1 Though it cannot readily distinguish RNA from DNA, the A260/A280 ratio is commonly employed, as it offers a simple and rapid2 assessment of the relative content of nucleic acid, which absorbs predominantly near 260 nm and protein, which absorbs primarily near 280 nm. Ratios 1.53. However, there are scenarios in which the protein/NA content cannot be as clearly or reliably inferred from simple uv-vis spectrophotometric measurements. For instance, (i) samples may contain one or more proteins which are relatively devoid of the aromatic amino acids responsible for absorption at ≈280 nm (Trp, Tyr, Phe), as is the case with some small RNA-binding proteins, and (ii) samples can exhibit intermediate A260/A280 ratios (~0.8 < ~1.5), where the protein/NA content is far less clear and may even reflect some high-affinity association between the protein and NA components. For such scenarios, we describe herein a suite of colorimetric assays to rapidly distinguish RNA, DNA, and reducing sugars in a potentially mixed sample of biomolecules. The methods…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3791/50225-v

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 9

Metadata

Authors
Patterson, J., & Mura, C.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Venue
Journal of Visualized Experiments
Published
2013-02-04
Issue
72
ISSN
1940-087X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4286854917
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Visualized Experiments (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
Keywords
colorimetric assay, nucleic acid quantification, A260/A280 ratio, reducing sugars, Benedict's reagent, protein-nucleic acid complexes, RNA-binding proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rapid Colorimetric Assays to Qualitatively Distinguish RNA and DNA in Biomolecular Samples. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3791/50225-v
The paper
Patterson, J., & Mura, C. (2013). Rapid Colorimetric Assays to Qualitatively Distinguish RNA and DNA in Biomolecular Samples. Journal of Visualized Experiments. https://doi.org/10.3791/50225-v