Cited by 83Cellular Mechanics and InteractionsCell Image Analysis TechniquesWound Healing and Treatments

Optimized Scratch Assay for In Vitro Testing of Cell Migration with an Automated Optical Camera

Open access
Vang Mouritzen, Michelle, Jenssen, Håvard·2018·Journal of Visualized Experiments

Abstract

Cell migration is an important process that influences many aspects of health, such as wound healing and cancer, and it is, therefore, crucial for developing methods to study the migration. The scratch assay has long been the most common in vitro method to test compounds with anti- and pro-migration properties because of its low cost and simple procedure. However, an often-reported problem of the assay is the accumulation of cells across the edge of the scratch. Furthermore, to obtain data from the assay, images of different exposures must be taken over a period of time at the exact same spot to compare the movements of the migration. Different analysis programs can be used to describe the scratch closure, but they are labor intensive, inaccurate, and forces cycles of temperature changes. In this study, we demonstrate an optimized method for testing the migration effect, e.g. with the naturally occurring proteins Human- and Bovine-Lactoferrin and their N-terminal peptide Lactoferricin on the epithelial cell line HaCaT. A crucial optimization is to wash and scratch in PBS, which eliminates the aforementioned accumulation of cells along the edge. This could be explained by the removal of cations, which have been shown to have an effect on keratinocyte cell-cell connection. To ensure true detection of migration, pre-treating with mitomycin C, a DNA synthesis inhibitor, was added to the protocol. Finally, we demonstrate the automated optical camera, which eliminates excessive tem…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3791/57691

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vang Mouritzen, M., & Jenssen, H.
Affiliations
Roskilde University (DK)
Venue
Journal of Visualized Experiments
Published
2018-08-08
Issue
138
ISSN
1940-087X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2885780883
Cited by
83
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Visualized Experiments (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RUCforsk (Roskilde University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Wound Healing and Treatments
Keywords
scratch assay, cell migration, HaCaT keratinocytes, lactoferrin, lactoferricin, mitomycin C, wound healing
MeSH terms
Biological Assay, Cell Line, Cell Movement, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Gamma Cameras, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review