Cited by 5Impact of Technology on AdolescentsRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness ManagementCyberloafing and Workplace Behavior

Predictive Power of Leisure Boredom on Social Media Addiction in University Students

Open access
UGURLU, Aylin·2023·Akdeniz Spor Bilimleri Dergisi

Abstract

People have become active users of Internet and social media applications going into every aspect of life. The purpose of this study was to investigate social media addiction and perception of boredom in leisure with respect to some variables and to examine the predictive power of perception of boredom in leisure on social media addiction. There was a total of 453 (212 females and 241 males) university students selected with convenience sampling method in the study group of the research. The participants filled the “Social Media Addiction Scale-Adult Form” (SMAS-AF) and “The Leisure Boredom Scale” (LBS). According to t-test results, there was not a statistically significant difference between mean scores in “SMAS-AF” and “LBS” scales. (p>0.01). MANOVA indicated that the main effect of the physical activity participation on the subscales of the “SMAS-AF” and “LBS” was statistically significant (p< 0.05). According to the MANOVA results, significant differences were found in the "SMAS-AF" and “LBS” for daily social media usage frequency, (p< 0.01). According to the results of the correlation test, there was a statistically significant between “SMAS-AF” and “LBS”. Regression analysis indicated that leisure boredom were significant predictors of social media addiction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.38021/asbid.1265805

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Uğurlu [44] confirmed that increased free time is associated with greater risk of social media addiction.

    “Uğurlu [44] further confirmed that increased free time is associated with greater risk of social media addiction.”
  • Uğurlu [44] found that boredom during free time significantly predicts social media addiction among university students.

    “Uğurlu [44] similarly found that boredom during free time significantly predicts social media addiction among university students.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Authors
UGURLU, A.
Affiliations
Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi
Venue
Akdeniz Spor Bilimleri Dergisi
Published
2023-09-28
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
939-951
ISSN
2667-5463 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387055239
Cited by
5
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Akdeniz Spor Bilimleri Dergisi (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DergiPark (Istanbul University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior
Keywords
social media addiction, leisure boredom, university students, physical activity, social media usage frequency, predictors of addiction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review