The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
The Need for Good Old Fashioned AI and Law
Open accessAbstract
«Good Old Fashioned AI and Law» beinhaltete typischerweise eine Partnerschaft zwischen juristischer Expertise und Computerwissen. Heutzutage gibt es jedoch eine neue Mode in der KI. Algorithmen, die aus grossen Datensätzen lernen, sind in vielen Bereichen in den Mittelpunkt gerückt. In diesem Beitrag lege ich eine Reihe von Merkmalen des juristischen Bereichs dar, die bedeuten, dass wir die neue KI mit Vorsicht einsetzen sollten. Für Systeme, die die juristische Entscheidungsfindung unterstützen und den Ausgang von Fällen vorhersagen, gibt es noch keine echte Alternative zu «Good Old Fashioned AI and Law». Maschinen sind vielleicht in der Lage, sich selbst Schach beizubringen, aber noch nicht Recht.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“'But how it will develop cannot be predicted from a consideration of the past. A legal expert might be able to conjecture some trends, but that art is beyond the capacity of current machine learning algorithms.'”
From Administrative due process when using automated decision-making in public administration: some notes from a Finnish perspective (2021) · cites this paper as Bench-Capon 2020, 28
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 5 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Bench-Capon, T. J. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Trevor J. M. Bench-Capon
- Venue
- Jusletter-IT
- Publisher
- Weblaw
- Published
- 2020
- Issue
- fses
- ISSN
- 1664-848X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3139081770
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 6.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- de
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Jusletter IT (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Artificial Intelligence in Law
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Keywords
- legal AI, machine learning in law, legal decision-making, case prediction, legal reasoning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Need for Good Old Fashioned AI and Law. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.38023/cefe7081-e6dd-49de-9592-9adbb6063fd6
- The paper
- Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2020). The Need for Good Old Fashioned AI and Law. Jusletter-IT. https://doi.org/10.38023/cefe7081-e6dd-49de-9592-9adbb6063fd6
