Cited by 3Craniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsReconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesSpinal Dysraphism and Malformations

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

KRANIOFACIALNE REKONSTRUKCIJE PRI OTROCIH S KRANIOSINOSTOZO

Open access
Spazzapan, Peter, Kočar, Miha, Eberlinc, Andreja, Velnar, Tomaž·2021·Slovenska pediatrija, revija pediatrov Slovenije in specialistov šolske ter visokošolske medicine Slovenije

Abstract

Craniofacial Reconstructions in Children with Craniosynostosis IzvleËekIzhodišËe.Kraniosinostoze so redke prirojene bolezni lobanje, ki nastanejo ob prezgodnji zakostenitvi enega ali veË lobanjskih šivov.Ker možgani ne morejo veË prosto rasti, pride do deformacij lobanje, ki lahko dolgoroËno povzroËijo znotrajlobanjsko hipertenzijo in kognitivni zaostanek.Preiskovanci in metode.V Enoti za otroško nevrokirurgijo UKC Ljubljana smo pregledali vse otroke, ki so bili od junija 2015 do septembra 2020 zdravljeni zaradi kraniosinostoze (N = 71; starost 12,8 let, obdobje spremljanja 2,7 let).Zbrali smo naslednje podatke: prizadet šiv, sindromska bolezen, hidrocefalus, Chiarijeva malformacija, povišan znotrajlobanjski tlak, starost ob operaciji, kirurška tehnika, potreba po veË operacijah in zapleti kirurškega zdravljenja.Rezultati.Sagitalnih je bilo 54,9 %, 25,3 % metopiËnih, 14 % koronarnih enostranskih, 1,4 % koronarnih obojestranskih in 1,4 % lambdoidnih enostranskih.V 2,8 % primerov je bilo prizadetih veË lobanjskih šivov.Sindromskih primerov je bilo 7 %.Skupaj smo opravili 74 posegov: 40,5 % frontoorbitalno podaljšanje, 32,4 % biparietalno remodeliranje, 22,9 % remodeliranje celotnega svoda, 2,7 % posteriorno distrakcijo in 1,3 % posteriorno ekspanzijo.ZakljuËki.Zdravljenje kraniosinostoz zahteva multidisciplinarni nevrokirurški, maksilofacialni in oralnokirurški pristop ter posege plastiËne in rekonstruktivne kirurgije.Zdravljenje kraniosinostoz je izkljuËno kirurško.Poseg ni potreben le v kozmetiËne namene, temveË predvsem zato, da možganom omogoËimo normalno rast.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.38031/slovpediatr-2021-2-01

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In our study, the majority of children underwent surgery before the age of 6 months.

    “In our study [1], the majority of children underwent surgery before the age of 6 months.”

    From Isolated Sagittal Craniosynostosis: A Comprehensive Review (2024) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Results report that children with scaphocephaly underwent surgery at a mean age of 5.1 months, and Table 2 lists 24 biparietal-remodelling procedures at that mean age. Neither passage gives the number of children operated on before six months, so the claim that a majority of the study’s children underwent surgery by then is not established. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Several studies have shown that children operated on in the first year or first six months of life have better outcomes than children operated on later or those operated on at a later age for objective reasons.

    “Several studies have shown that children operated on in the first year or first six months of life have better outcomes than children operated on later or those operated on at a later age for objective reasons (poor general condition or late referral to a surgical facility).”

    From Isolated Sagittal Craniosynostosis: A Comprehensive Review (2024) · cites this paper as [1]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says surgery is usually performed in the first 12 months, and the Results (page unavailable) report that all children with signs of elevated intracranial pressure were over two years old at surgery. This supports concern about delay, but the paper does not report the claimed comparison of overall outcomes for surgery in the first year or six months versus later surgery, nor does it link that comparison to poor general condition or late referral. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Children may be referred for surgery because of a late diagnosis of ISS at the time of hospitalisation due to a general neurocognitive delay.

    “Indeed, children may be referred for surgery because of a late diagnosis of ISS at the time of hospitalisation due to a general neurocognitive delay [1,30,32].”

    From Isolated Sagittal Craniosynostosis: A Comprehensive Review (2024) · cites this paper as [1]

    In the surgical-results passage under “Sindromske kraniosinostoze” (page not provided), the paper reports two children operated on at ages 8 and 10 because their scaphocephaly had not been diagnosed in early childhood. It does not say they were diagnosed during hospitalisation for general neurocognitive delay or referred for surgery on that basis. The “Trigonocefalija” section discusses cognitive and motor delay, but does not connect it to those late diagnoses. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ISS occurs more frequently in boys than in girls.

    “It occurs more frequently in boys than in girls.”

    From Isolated Sagittal Craniosynostosis: A Comprehensive Review (2024) · cites this paper as [1]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Arnaud E, Paternoster G, James C, Morissea- u-Durand M-P, Couloigner V, Diner P et al. Stra- tégie craniofaciale pour les faciocraniosténoses. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2016; 61: 408-19.
  2. Kajdic N, Spazzapan P, Velnar T. Cranio- synostosis -Recognition, clinical characteristics, and treatment. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2018; 18: 110-6.
  3. Van der Meulen J. Metopic synostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 2012; 28: 1359-67.
  4. Chieffo D, Tamburrini G, Massimi L, Di Gio- vanni S, Giansanti C, Caldarelli M, Di Rocco C. Long-term neuropsychological development in single-suture craniosynostosis treated early. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2010; 5: 232-7.
  5. Van Wijk RM, Pelsma M, Groothuis-Oudsho- orn CG, IJzerman MJ, van Vlimmeren LA, Boere -Boonekamp MM. Response to pediatric physical therapy in infants with positional preference and skull deformation. Phys Ther 2014; 94: 1262-71.
  6. Esparza J, Hinojosa J, García-Recuero I, Romance A, Pascual B, Martínez de Aragón A. Surgical treatment of isolated and syndromic craniosynostosis. Results and complications in 283 consecutive cases. Neurocirugia 2008; 19: 509-29.
  7. Magge SN, Westerveld M, Pruzinsky T, Persing JA. Long-term neuropsychological effects of sagittal craniosynostosis on child develo- pment. J Craniofac Surg 2002; 13: 99-104.
  8. JugoviÊ D, Spazzapan P. Endoskopsko zdravljenje skafocefalije. Prikaz primera in nove operacijske tehnike. Zdrav Vestn 2015; 84: 642-8.
  9. Tessier P, Guiot G, Rougerie J, Delbet JP, Pastoriza J. Cranio-naso-orbito-facial osteoto- mies. Hypertelorism. Ann Chir Plast 1967; 12: 103-18.
  10. Bottero L, Lajeunie E, Arnaud E, Marchac D, Renier D. Functional outcome after surgery for trigonocephaly. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102: 952-8.
  11. Spazzapan P, Bosnjak R, Velnar T. Craniofa- cial reconstruction of the skull in anterior plagio- cephaly: A case report. Br J Med Med Res 2016; 18: 1-7.
  12. Spazzapan P, Arnaud E, Baujat G, Nizon M, Malan V, Brunelle F et al. Clinical and neuroradi- ological features of the 9p deletion syndrome. Childs Nerv Syst 2016; 32: 327-35.
  13. Spazzapan P, KoËar M. Kraniofacialne rekon- strukcije pri otrocih s kraniosinostozo. Slov Pedia- tr 2021; 28(2): 67-77. https://doi.org/10.38031/ slovpediatr-2021-2-01.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Spazzapan, P., Kočar, M., Eberlinc, A., & Velnar, T.
Affiliations
Ljubljana University Medical Centre (SI)
Venue
Slovenska pediatrija, revija pediatrov Slovenije in specialistov šolske ter visokošolske medicine Slovenije
Published
2021
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
67-77
ISSN
  • 1318-4423 (ISSN-L)
  • 2712-3960
OpenAlex
W3175051446
Cited by
3
References
3
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
sl
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Slovenska pediatrija revija pediatrov Slovenije in specialistov šolske ter visokošolske medicine Slovenije (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations
Keywords
craniosynostosis, craniofacial reconstruction, pediatric neurosurgery, sagittal synostosis, metopic synostosis, coronal synostosis, lambdoid synostosis, Chiari malformation, hydrocephalus, intracranial hypertension, syndromic craniosynostosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review