The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Transformation of law in the context of digitalization: defining the correct priorities
Open accessAbstract
The subject under analysis is the peculiarities around the legal regulation of digital technologies and products arising from digital technologies. The choice of this topic was predetermined by the active development of digital services and digital financial assets, and the necessity to adapt modern legislation to the needs of the digital economy. Despite the fact that several strategies for the development of digital law are being worked out at the level of international organizations, neither in theory nor in practice is there a single understanding of the legal nature of digital technologies and the foundations of their legal regulation. From this perspective, the purpose of this article is to understand the system and the main categories of the digital economy through the prism of fundamental legal institutions, based both on the traditional principles of scientific analysis and on the results steaming from applied data processing methods. Using methods of theoretical modeling, idealization, and theoretical experiments, the authors consider the categories of legal personality, security, and tort of digital technologies and products, compare them with similar legal institutions, and determine possible options for integrating new legal categories into traditional rule of law on contracts, liability, and the protection of intellectual rights. As a result of the study, the authors have assembled their vision of those benchmarks, on which international strategies for regulating the digital economy should be built. The authors proceed from the fact that the adaptive capabilities of traditional law are very limited in relation to digital technologies; furthermore, in relation to many of them, qualitatively new legal models should be developed. The article presents the results of a review of the main legal parameters of digital technologies. Formulations of legal personality and protection are proposed, definitions of digital technology products in civil and copyright law are formulated. The conclusion reached concerns the inconsistency of approaches to assessing the legal nature of digital objects, and the insufficient consideration of the technical aspects of digital technologies, as well as the need to develop — at the international level — a unified legal strategy for civil and intellectual law regarding digital technologies. This study underlines, among the priority tasks and directions, the issues of legal personality of digital technologies, and the essential mechanisms for the protection of products using digital technologies. The conclusions formulated in the article have important practical and methodological significance, and can be taken into account when reforming the current legislation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, Africa and Latin America together account for less than 5% of the global colocation data centers.”
From China’s Digital Silk Road in the Age of the Digital Economy: Political Analysis (2022) · cites this paper as [22]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Why Fairness Cannot Be Automated: Bridging the Gap Between EU Non-Discrimination Law and AIPreprint
Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Russell, C. (2020) · Computer Law and Security Review · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3547922 · Cited by 448
Why fairness cannot be automated: Bridging the gap between EU non-discrimination law and AI
Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Russell, C. (2021) · Computer Law & Security Review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105567 · Cited by 336
Cryptocurrencies: market analysis and perspectives
Giudici, G., Milne, A. K. L., & Vinogradov, D. V. (2019) · Journal of Industrial and Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s40812-019-00138-6 · Cited by 287
Explainable AI under Contract and Tort Law: Legal Incentives and Technical Challenges
Hacker, P., Krestel, R., Grundmann, S., & Naumann, F. (2020) · Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1007/s10506-020-09260-6 · Cited by 204
What's Inside the Black Box? AI Challenges for Lawyers and Researchers
Yu, R., & Alì, G. S. (2019) · Legal Information Management · doi:10.1017/s1472669619000021 · Cited by 137
Artificial Intelligence from the Point of View of Law
Ponkin, I. V., & Redkina, A. (2018) · Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Юридические науки · doi:10.22363/2313-2337-2018-22-1-91-109 · Cited by 101
Originality in UK Copyright Law: The Old “Skill and Labour” Doctrine Under Pressure
Rahmatian, A. (2013) · GRURRR. Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht, Rechtsprechungs-Report/GRUR-DVD/GRUR-CD/IIC/Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht/Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht. Internationaler Teil · doi:10.1007/s40319-012-0003-4 · Cited by 94
PAUSE THE BLOCKCHAIN LEGAL REVOLUTION
Low, K. F. K., & Mik, E. (2019) · International and Comparative Law Quarterly · doi:10.1017/s0020589319000502 · Cited by 89
The Use of Drones in Emergency Medicine: Practical and Legal Aspects
Konert, A., Smereka, J., & Szarpak, Ł. (2019) · Emergency Medicine International · doi:10.1155/2019/3589792 · Cited by 86
Drone delivery of medications: Review of the landscape and legal considerations
Lin, C. A., Shah, K., Mauntel, L. C. C., et al. (2017) · American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy · doi:10.2146/ajhp170196 · Cited by 70
Cited by
China’s Digital Silk Road in the Age of the Digital Economy: Political Analysis
Cheng, G. (2022) · Vestnik RUDN International Relations · doi:10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-2-271-287 · Cited by 20
“Fifthly, lack of understanding of the legal nature of digital technologies and relevant legal regulation leads to the lack of the major legislation, regulation and supervision towards the digital trade (Sidorenko & von Arx, 2020, p. 24).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Sidorenko, E. L., & Von Arx, P.
- Affiliations
- Moscow State Institute of International Relations (RU)
- Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, The OSCE Programme Office in Bishkek
- ORCID
- Sidorenko, Elina L.
- Venue
- Digital Law Journal
- Published
- 2020-05-17
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24-38
- ISSN
- 2686-9136 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3026645219
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8
- FWCI
- 11.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Digital Law Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Law › Digital Transformation in Law
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Social Sciences › Law › Intellectual Property Rights and Media
- Keywords
- digital economy, legal regulation of digital technologies, digital security, digital financial assets, intellectual property protection, copyright law, civil law, liability, digitalization of law
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transformation of law in the context of digitalization: defining the correct priorities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.38044/dlj-2020-1-1-24-38
- The paper
- Sidorenko, E. L., & Von Arx, P. (2020). Transformation of law in the context of digitalization: defining the correct priorities. Digital Law Journal. https://doi.org/10.38044/dlj-2020-1-1-24-38