Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 239

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Efficacy and Safety of Canagliflozin Treatment in Older Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Trial

Bode, Bruce, Stenlöf, Kaj, Sullivan, Daniel, Fung, Albert, Usiskin, Keith·2013·Hospital Practice

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Canagliflozin is a sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor developed for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Our randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study (www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01106651) evaluated the efficacy and safety of canagliflozin therapy in older subjects (aged 55-80 years) with T2DM inadequately controlled on their current regimen of blood glucose-lowering agents (any approved oral or injectable treatment). METHODS: Subjects (N = 716) aged 55 to 80 years (mean, 63.6 years) with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels ≥ 7.0% to ≤ 10.0% were randomized. Seven hundred fourteen received canagliflozin 100 mg or 300 mg or placebo (1:1:1) daily. The prespecified primary endpoint was change from baseline in HbA1c level at week 26. Prespecified secondary endpoints included proportion of subjects achieving HbA1c levels < 7.0%, change from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level and systolic blood pressure (BP), and percent change from baseline in body weight, triglyceride levels, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) level. Adverse events (AEs) were reported throughout the study. RESULTS: At week 26, treatment with canagliflozin 100 mg and 300 mg significantly reduced HbA1c levels compared with placebo (-0.60%, -0.73%, -0.03%, respectively; P < 0.001); more subjects achieved HbA1c levels < 7.0% with both canagliflozin doses compared with placebo (P < 0.001). Both canagliflozin doses significantly reduced body weight, FPG level, and systolic BP, and increased HDL-C level compared with placebo (P < 0.001); low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level was increased with both canagliflozin doses compared with placebo. The overall AE incidence was slightly higher with canagliflozin 300 mg than with canagliflozin 100 mg or placebo (78.0%, 72.2%, 73.4%, respectively). Serious AE and AE-related discontinuation rates were low across groups. Both canagliflozin doses were associated with higher rates than placebo of genital mycotic infections, urinary tract infections, and osmotic diuresis-related AEs (ie, pollakiuria, polyuria). Documented hypoglycemia rates were modestly higher with both canagliflozin doses compared with placebo. CONCLUSION: Canagliflozin improved glycemic control, reduced body weight and systolic BP, and was generally well tolerated in older subjects with T2DM who were on background therapy with a variety of blood glucose-lowering agents.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3810/hp.2013.04.1020

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 239

Metadata

Authors
Bode, B., Stenlöf, K., Sullivan, D., Fung, A., & Usiskin, K.
Venue
Hospital Practice
Published
2013-04
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
72-84
ISSN
  • 0018-5809 (ISSN-L)
  • 2154-8331
  • 2377-1003
OpenAlex
W2120919346
Cited by
239
References
3
FWCI
31.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficacy and Safety of Canagliflozin Treatment in Older Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3810/hp.2013.04.1020
The paper
Bode, B., Stenlöf, K., Sullivan, D., Fung, A., & Usiskin, K. (2013). Efficacy and Safety of Canagliflozin Treatment in Older Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Trial. Hospital Practice. https://doi.org/10.3810/hp.2013.04.1020

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.