The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Choosing and Using Exercise Equipment
Abstract
(1997). Choosing and Using Exercise Equipment. The Physician and Sportsmedicine: Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 107-108.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Personal customizing exercise with a wearable measurement and control unit
Wang, Z., Kiryu, T., & Tamura, N. (2005) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-2-14 · Cited by 13
Wang, Z., Tamura, N., & Kiryu, T. (2005) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/iembs.2005.1616586
“Another disadvantage of traditional exercise machines is that most of them only provide pre-installed exercise programs with limited variations [9].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Stamford, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Louisville (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stamford, Bryant
- Venue
- The Physician and Sportsmedicine
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 107-108
- ISSN
- 0091-3847 (ISSN-L)
- 2326-3660
- OpenAlex
- W1987150799
- Semantic Scholar
- 30cc87de434f0901e62b0257dfa1bcacff21d561
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Physician and Sportsmedicine (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Training Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Keywords
- exercise equipment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
