The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Services Integration in Tanzania e-Government Systems
Open accessAbstract
The interoperability of information systems for public organizations is a significant opportunity for improved delivery of e-government services. However, the lack of e-government services integration is one of the issues preventing services from effectively reaching citizens in many developing nations, especially in this era of information technology advancement. Consequently, this paper aims to provide background information and a framework for comprehending the relevance of Tanzania's integration of e-government services. To understand the current state of the art and the prospects for system integration in government procedures, a thorough government institution Information Systems analysis was done to understand the magnitude of the problem. The survey revealed that the absence of electronic data exchange between public information systems leads to information system silos, which hinder efficiency and synergy in the provision of electronic services. A framework for e-government service integration is proposed utilizing a design science research approach to explain the possibilities of service integration in the public sector. The framework suggests harmonizing public institutions in e-government project plans, communicating e-government systems through a unified network, and establishing the e-government service catalog.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling
Etikan, I. (2016) · American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics · doi:10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 · Cited by 11,412
A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research
Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222240302 · Cited by 7,832 · cited 1×
“Consequently, four cycles of the DSR approach, namely, 1) Problem Analysis, 2) Solution Suggestion, 3) Solution Development, and 4) Solution Evaluation was adopted to model the research process of this study (Peffers et al., 2007; Rossi et al., 2006).”
Method
Cited by
Fault Detection Method based on Artificial Neural Network for 330kV Nigerian Transmission Line
Musa Oruma, A., Mahmud, I., Alhaji Adamu, U., Yakubu Wakawa, S., Idris, G., & Mustapha, M. (2024) · International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) · doi:10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24apr651 · Cited by 1,767
Hybrid Intelligence Systems Combining Human Expertise and AI/RPA for Complex Problem Solving
Venigandla, K., Vemuri, N., & Vemuri, N. (2024) · International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) · doi:10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24mar2039 · Cited by 20
Cyberbullying: Legal and Ethical Implications, Challenges and Opportunities for Policy Development
A. Angwaomaodoko, E. (2024) · International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT) · doi:10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24apr108 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Yusuph Kibira, Y., Mohsin, M., & Shao, D.
- Venue
- International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT)
- Published
- 2024-03-30
- Pages
- 1523-1543
- ISSN
- 2456-2165 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4393345205
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 508.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Services Integration in Tanzania e-Government Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24mar1155
- The paper
- Yusuph Kibira, Y., Mohsin, M., & Shao, D. (2024). Services Integration in Tanzania e-Government Systems. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT). https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/ijisrt24mar1155
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.