The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Arts-based self-study: Documenting the ripple effect
Open accessAbstract
Like all forms of inquiry, arts-based self-study research can have unexpected consequences. Although we may start out with a fairly clear objective, the data we generate through arts-based methods might address other questions that are even more important than the ones we thought to ask initially, and our study might have an impact that extends beyond the original parameters of the design. The most powerful results of an arts-based self-study intended to improve our own practice might occur in another arena, a ripple effect that is visible only after our inquiry is completed, and hence, undetected because our gaze has shifted elsewhere. By describing and analysing what happens during and after three self-studies done by teachers and teacher educators, this article illustrates the use of visual and other arts-based methods (photography, video, creative writing and drawing) and explores the challenge and nature of the potential ripple effect in/of self-study for learning and growth for many.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We understand self-study as a methodology that can facilitate professional growth that responds to social issues as these touch our lives (Weber, 2014).”
From Engaging in Arts-Based Poetic Inquiry: Generating Pedagogical Possibilities in Preservice Teacher Education (2022) · cites this paper as Weber, 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Becker HS 1974. Photography and sociology. Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication, 1(1): 3-26.
- Berger J 1972. Ways of seeing. London: Penguin.
- Childs K 2001. The struggles of mentoring: Just where do you think you're going. Masters thesis. Concordia University, Montreal.
- Childs K 2005. Just where do I think I'm going? Working with marginalized and disaffected youth and their self-study. In C Mitchell, S Weber & K O'Reilly Scanlon (eds), Just who do we think we are? Methodologies for autobiography and self-study in teaching. London and New York: Routlege/ Falmer, 142-153.
- Eisner EW 1995. What artistically crafted research can help us to understand about schools. Educational Theory, 45(1): 1-13.
- Eisner EW 1997. The promise and perils of alternative forms of data representation. Educational Researcher, 26(6): 4-11.
- Gore JM 1993. The struggle for pedagogies. London: Routledge.
- Greene M 1977. Toward wide-awakeness: An argument for the arts and humanities in education. Teachers College Record, 79(1): 119-125.
- Hargreaves A & Fink D 2006. The ripple effect. Challenging the Status Quo, 63(8): 16-21.
- Hooks B 1994. Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.
- Hooks B 1995. Art on my mind: Visual politics. New York: New Press.
- Hubbard J 1994. Shooting back from the reservation. New York: New Press.
- Levy L 2007a. Girls' meaning making practices and critical art education. Journal of Cultural Research in Art Education, 25: 129-141.
- Levy L & Weber S 2010. Teen moms using digital photography to share their views. Girlhood Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 3(2): 129-139.
- Levy L & Weber S 2011. Community-based media production as critical pedagogy for pregnant teens and new young mothers. Studies in Art Education, 52(4): 292-309.
- Mitchell C & Weber S 1999. Reinventing ourselves as teachers: Beyond nostalgia. London: Falmer Press.
- Mitchell C, Weber S & O'Reilly-Scanlon K (eds) 2005. Just who do we think we are? Methodologies for autobiography and self-study in teaching. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
- Mitchell C, Weber S & Pithouse K 2009. Facing the public: Using photography for self-study and social action. In D Tidwell, M Heston & L Fitzgerald (eds), Research methods for the self-study of practice. New York: Springer, 119-135.
- Pithouse K, Mitchell C & Weber S 2009. Self-study in teaching and teacher development: A call to action. Educational Action Research, 17(1): 43-62.
- Spence J 1995. Cultural snipping, the art of transgression. New York: Routledge.
- Spence J & Solomon J (eds) 1995. What can a woman do with a camera? London: Scarlet Press.
- Strong-Wilson T, Mitchell C, Morrison C, Radford L & Pithouse-Morgan K (2014). Using digital memory-work in teaching for transformation. In L Thomas (ed), Becoming teacher: Sites for development of Canadian Teacher Education. E-book published by the Canadian Association for Teacher Education at https://sites.google.com/site/cssecate/fall-working-conference, 442-468
- Whitehead J 2000. How do I improve my practice? Creating and legitimating an epistemology of practice. Reflective Practice, 1(1): 91-104.
Cited by
Müller, M., & Kruger, F. (2022) · Studying Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/17425964.2022.2079619 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Weber, S.
- Affiliations
- Concordia University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Weber, Sandra
- Venue
- Perspectives in Education
- Publisher
- University of the Free State
- Published
- 2014-06-30
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 8-20
- ISSN
- 0258-2236 (ISSN-L)
- 2519-593X
- OpenAlex
- W2475136236
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 8.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Perspectives in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
- Keywords
- cascading effects, teacher professional development, teacher educators, photography, video, creative writing, drawings, reflective practice, learning and growth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
