Cited by 15Disability Rights and RepresentationDisability Education and EmploymentInclusion and Disability in Education and Sport

Inclusion of disability issues in teaching and research in higher education

Open access
Ohajunwa, Chioma, Hardy, Anneli, Mckenzie, Judith, Lorenzo, Theresa·2014·Perspectives in Education

Abstract

Evidence suggests that the lack of inclusion of disability issues in the curricula of higher education institutions may result in the perpetuation of practices that discriminate against disabled people in the broader society. In light of this claim, this article investigates whether and how disability issues are included in the teaching and research of three faculties at the University of Cape Town (UCT), namely the faculties of Health Sciences, Humanities, and Engineering and the Built Environment. A survey of disability inclusion was conducted across the faculties, followed by interviews with selected participants. The study revealed low levels of disability inclusion, and that disability is not viewed as an issue of social justice and transformation overall. However, there are pockets of inclusion, the nature of which differs for each faculty. In the Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, disability is included as an issue of legislation, space and environment, while the Faculty of Humanities focuses on the sociocultural and socio-economic impact of disability, and the Faculty of Health Sciences introduces disability with an emphasis on individual impairment, environmental effects, community-based rehabilitation and inclusive development, as well as the prevention and management of disability. We propose the creation of an institutional system that will build the capacity of lecturers to include disability in teaching and research across faculties, in line with UCT’s transformation agenda.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.38140/pie.v32i3.1875

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Barriers for students with disabilities in South African higher education include exclusive classroom teaching practices.

    “Among others, are the inaccessible infrastructure [ 30 ], barriers of high entry-level requirements into specific professional programmes [ 13 ], exclusive classroom teaching practices [ 31 , 32 ], an unwillingness among academic staff to include these students [ 33 ], and a lack of relevant and adequate AT and assistive devices, resulting in a digital divide [ 34 ].”

    From Provision of Assistive Technology for Students with Disabilities in South African Higher Education (2021) · cites this paper as [31]

    The Abstract and ‘Disability and curriculum’ section describe limited inclusion of disability issues as a subject of teaching at UCT. They do not establish that classroom teaching practices exclude students with disabilities from participating. Searches for classroom exclusion and barriers to disabled students’ learning found no passage addressing that claim. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

9 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Gabel, S.L. 2010. A disability studies framework for policy activism in postsecondary education. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 23(1): 63-71
  2. Garland-Thomson, R. & Stoddard-Holmes, M. 2005. Introduction. Journal of Medical Humanities 26(2-3): 73-77.
  3. M.Phil. dissertation. Cape Town: University of Cape Town.
  4. Probyn, M.S., Murray, L., Botha, P., Botya, M., Brooks, V. & Westphal, L. 2002. Minding the gaps -An investigation into language policy and practice in four Eastern Cape districts. Perspectives in Education, 20(1): 29-46
  5. Thomas, C. 2002. Disability theory: Key ideas, issues and thinkers. London: John Wiley & Sons.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ohajunwa, C., Hardy, A., Mckenzie, J., & Lorenzo, T.
Affiliations
University of Cape Town (ZA)
Venue
Perspectives in Education
Published
2014-09-30
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
104-117
ISSN
  • 0258-2236 (ISSN-L)
  • 2519-593X
OpenAlex
W1546557822
Cited by
15
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Perspectives in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Perspectives in Education (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Keywords
disability inclusion, disability studies, higher education curriculum, disability discrimination, social justice, transformation, lecturer capacity building, disability law, community-based rehabilitation, inclusive development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review